Re: [RFA] i386-tdep.c, i386_process_record, document fall-through case.

[Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>]

I am not sure.

As my poor understanding of C language, break or not break are both OK
for this part.

Thanks,
Hui

On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 02:46, Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com> wrote:
> But should there be a break there?  Or not?
>
>
>
> Hui Zhu wrote:
>>
>> Hi Michael,
>>
>> Sorry for late.
>>
>> I don't know we need this patch or not.
>>
>> As some people's mail, they don't like this part code.   This part
>> should rewrite to share code with opcode or something.
>> So I think in the near future, this code will be rewritten by these
>> guys or somebody else.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Hui
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 03:05, Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Michael Snyder wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hui, is this right?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Michael
>>>>
>>> Ping?   ;-)
>>>
>>>
>
>