From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-79399-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 15125 invoked by alias); 8 Mar 2011 02:35:33 -0000
Received: (qmail 15037 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Mar 2011 02:35:32 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-gw0-f54.google.com (HELO mail-gw0-f54.google.com) (74.125.83.54)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 02:35:28 +0000
Received: by gwj22 with SMTP id 22so2203603gwj.13        for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 18:35:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.150.58.4 with SMTP id g4mr5318796yba.155.1299551726665; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 18:35:26 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.147.125.2 with HTTP; Mon, 7 Mar 2011 18:35:06 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4D7527EE.9020204@vmware.com>
References: <4D6EC5ED.3070307@vmware.com> <4D7137F6.4020000@vmware.com> <AANLkTikccSXC_JargcKh56Bue_++805pptaZTLcab+cU@mail.gmail.com> <4D7527EE.9020204@vmware.com>
From: Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2011 04:35:00 -0000
Message-ID: <AANLkTinNQXQWRvk1G8fiXGt1tJXwOGc=BzCDmv_fdf=r@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFA] i386-tdep.c, i386_process_record, document fall-through case.
To: Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com>
Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-03/txt/msg00512.txt.bz2

I am not sure.

As my poor understanding of C language, break or not break are both OK
for this part.

Thanks,
Hui

On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 02:46, Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com> wrote:
> But should there be a break there? =A0Or not?
>
>
>
> Hui Zhu wrote:
>>
>> Hi Michael,
>>
>> Sorry for late.
>>
>> I don't know we need this patch or not.
>>
>> As some people's mail, they don't like this part code. =A0 This part
>> should rewrite to share code with opcode or something.
>> So I think in the near future, this code will be rewritten by these
>> guys or somebody else.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Hui
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 03:05, Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Michael Snyder wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hui, is this right?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Michael
>>>>
>>> Ping? =A0 ;-)
>>>
>>>
>
>