* [PATCH] Fix is_amd64_regs_target check in i386-avx512.exp
@ 2018-09-28 20:41 Simon Marchi
2018-10-01 9:49 ` Metzger, Markus T
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Simon Marchi @ 2018-09-28 20:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches; +Cc: Markus Metzger, Simon Marchi
As reported by Jan here:
https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2018-09/msg00831.html
the check that sets the number of available registers seems backwards.
I can't test this patch however, since I don't have access to a cpu with
AVX512. Could somebody perhaps from Intel, or somebody else that has
access to such CPU, take a look?
Alternatively, do you know if a machine in the GCC compile farm has this
feature? I didn't find any, but maybe I didn't look enough.
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gdb.arch/i386-avx512.exp: Fix setting of nr_regs based on
is_amd64_regs_target.
---
gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/i386-avx512.exp | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/i386-avx512.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/i386-avx512.exp
index de2f62c3e1f..f27af534cfd 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/i386-avx512.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/i386-avx512.exp
@@ -93,9 +93,9 @@ gdb_test "break [gdb_get_line_number "third breakpoint here"]" \
gdb_continue_to_breakpoint "continue to third breakpoint in main"
if [is_amd64_regs_target] {
- set nr_regs 8
-} else {
set nr_regs 32
+} else {
+ set nr_regs 8
}
for { set r 0 } { $r < $nr_regs } { incr r } {
--
2.19.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH] Fix is_amd64_regs_target check in i386-avx512.exp
2018-09-28 20:41 [PATCH] Fix is_amd64_regs_target check in i386-avx512.exp Simon Marchi
@ 2018-10-01 9:49 ` Metzger, Markus T
2018-10-01 16:04 ` Simon Marchi
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Metzger, Markus T @ 2018-10-01 9:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Simon Marchi, gdb-patches
Hello Simon,
> As reported by Jan here:
>
> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2018-09/msg00831.html
>
> the check that sets the number of available registers seems backwards.
> I can't test this patch however, since I don't have access to a cpu with AVX512.
> Could somebody perhaps from Intel, or somebody else that has access to such
> CPU, take a look?
It indeed is backwards.
The current test fails badly when run with -m32.
> gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> * gdb.arch/i386-avx512.exp: Fix setting of nr_regs based on
> is_amd64_regs_target.
> ---
> gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/i386-avx512.exp | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/i386-avx512.exp
> b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/i386-avx512.exp
> index de2f62c3e1f..f27af534cfd 100644
> --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/i386-avx512.exp
> +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/i386-avx512.exp
> @@ -93,9 +93,9 @@ gdb_test "break [gdb_get_line_number "third breakpoint
> here"]" \ gdb_continue_to_breakpoint "continue to third breakpoint in main"
>
> if [is_amd64_regs_target] {
> - set nr_regs 8
> -} else {
> set nr_regs 32
> +} else {
> + set nr_regs 8
> }
>
> for { set r 0 } { $r < $nr_regs } { incr r } {
> --
> 2.19.0
With your patch, the test only fails for zmm registers due to broken XSAVE
handling. This is fixed by Jan's patch. With both patches together, the test
passes for -m32.
Regards,
Markus.
Intel Deutschland GmbH
Registered Address: Am Campeon 10-12, 85579 Neubiberg, Germany
Tel: +49 89 99 8853-0, www.intel.de
Managing Directors: Christin Eisenschmid, Christian Lamprechter
Chairperson of the Supervisory Board: Nicole Lau
Registered Office: Munich
Commercial Register: Amtsgericht Muenchen HRB 186928
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Fix is_amd64_regs_target check in i386-avx512.exp
2018-10-01 9:49 ` Metzger, Markus T
@ 2018-10-01 16:04 ` Simon Marchi
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Simon Marchi @ 2018-10-01 16:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Metzger, Markus T; +Cc: Simon Marchi, gdb-patches
On 2018-10-01 05:49, Metzger, Markus T wrote:
> Hello Simon,
>
>> As reported by Jan here:
>>
>> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2018-09/msg00831.html
>>
>> the check that sets the number of available registers seems backwards.
>> I can't test this patch however, since I don't have access to a cpu
>> with AVX512.
>> Could somebody perhaps from Intel, or somebody else that has access to
>> such
>> CPU, take a look?
>
> It indeed is backwards.
>
> The current test fails badly when run with -m32.
>
>
>> gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>>
>> * gdb.arch/i386-avx512.exp: Fix setting of nr_regs based on
>> is_amd64_regs_target.
>> ---
>> gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/i386-avx512.exp | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/i386-avx512.exp
>> b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/i386-avx512.exp
>> index de2f62c3e1f..f27af534cfd 100644
>> --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/i386-avx512.exp
>> +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/i386-avx512.exp
>> @@ -93,9 +93,9 @@ gdb_test "break [gdb_get_line_number "third
>> breakpoint
>> here"]" \ gdb_continue_to_breakpoint "continue to third breakpoint in
>> main"
>>
>> if [is_amd64_regs_target] {
>> - set nr_regs 8
>> -} else {
>> set nr_regs 32
>> +} else {
>> + set nr_regs 8
>> }
>>
>> for { set r 0 } { $r < $nr_regs } { incr r } {
>> --
>> 2.19.0
>
> With your patch, the test only fails for zmm registers due to broken
> XSAVE
> handling. This is fixed by Jan's patch. With both patches together,
> the test
> passes for -m32.
Thanks a lot, I pushed it!
Simon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-10-01 16:04 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-09-28 20:41 [PATCH] Fix is_amd64_regs_target check in i386-avx512.exp Simon Marchi
2018-10-01 9:49 ` Metzger, Markus T
2018-10-01 16:04 ` Simon Marchi
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox