From: "Metzger, Markus T" <markus.t.metzger@intel.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: "jan.kratochvil@redhat.com" <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>,
"gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/3] doc, record: document record changes
Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2013 14:07:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <A78C989F6D9628469189715575E55B2307B8743A@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <838v6bhttl.fsf@gnu.org>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eli Zaretskii [mailto:eliz@gnu.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 6:24 PM
> To: Metzger, Markus T
Thanks for your review.
> [May I ask that you use your address fewer than 3 times in the headers?]
I reduced it by one.
> > +"record function-call-history" prints the names of the functions
> > +from instructions stored in the execution log.
>
> "prints the names of the functions called by instructions in the
> execution log"
I'm not sure whether "called" is the right term. The algorithm walks over
all instructions and collects the functions from which these instructions
originated.
Example:
1 void foo (void)
2 {
3 ...
4 bar ();
5 ...
6 }
When we record the execution of foo, there will be instructions for the
first ..., then instructions for bar, and then instructions for the second ....
The "record function-call-history" will print:
foo.c:1-4 foo (void)
bar.c:8-12 bar (void)
foo.c:5-6 foo (void
> > +@kindex show record full memory-query
> > +@item show record full memory-query
>
> I think it is good enough to have only one "@kindex set record" and
> one "@kindex show record" entry (which you already have at the
> beginning of this description), without the entries that advertise the
> rest of the command arguments. These varieties are all described
> together, so the multitude of index entries does not have any useful
> effect, it just bloats the index.
I just renamed the text for existing indices. Do you still want me to
merge them?
> > +@item record function-call-history
> > +Print function names for instructions stored in the recorded execution
> > +log. Prints one line for each sequence of instructions that is
> > +correlated to the same function.
>
> Isn't the last sentence equivalent to saying
>
> Prints one line for each function call in the execution log.
>
> ? If it is equivalent, I think my suggested wording is more clear and
> less technical.
See above.
Thanks,
Markus.
Intel GmbH
Dornacher Strasse 1
85622 Feldkirchen/Muenchen, Deutschland
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Feldkirchen bei Muenchen
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Christian Lamprechter, Hannes Schwaderer, Douglas Lusk
Registergericht: Muenchen HRB 47456
Ust.-IdNr./VAT Registration No.: DE129385895
Citibank Frankfurt a.M. (BLZ 502 109 00) 600119052
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-01 14:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-25 16:15 [PATCH 0/3] target record-btrace markus.t.metzger
2013-02-25 16:16 ` [PATCH 3/3] doc, record: document record changes markus.t.metzger
2013-02-26 17:24 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-03-01 14:07 ` Metzger, Markus T [this message]
2013-03-01 14:26 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-03-01 14:48 ` Metzger, Markus T
2013-03-01 15:12 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-03-01 15:21 ` Metzger, Markus T
2013-03-02 9:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-02-25 16:16 ` [PATCH 2/3] record-btrace, disas: omit pc prefix markus.t.metzger
2013-02-27 7:59 ` Jan Kratochvil
2013-02-28 7:45 ` Metzger, Markus T
2013-02-28 7:56 ` Jan Kratochvil
2013-02-28 8:45 ` Metzger, Markus T
2013-02-28 8:54 ` Jan Kratochvil
2013-02-25 16:16 ` [PATCH 1/3] record, btrace: add record-btrace target markus.t.metzger
2013-02-27 7:38 ` Jan Kratochvil
2013-02-27 19:43 ` Jan Kratochvil
2013-02-28 17:17 ` Metzger, Markus T
2013-03-01 9:26 ` Jan Kratochvil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=A78C989F6D9628469189715575E55B2307B8743A@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=markus.t.metzger@intel.com \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox