Re: [RFA] Compile objc-lang.c, objc-exp.tab.c [1/5]

[Adam Fedor <fedor@doc.com>]

On Wednesday, February 19, 2003, at 12:06 PM, Elena Zannoni wrote:

> Adam Fedor writes:
>> Now that I'm almost done, I finally understand the patch lingo (Thanks
>> Michael)! This is a repost of the first of five final patches for ObjC
>> suppport:
>>
>> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2003-01/msg00049.html
>>
>> The other two that I also need approval for are:
>>
>> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2003-01/msg00050.html
>> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2003-01/msg00080.html
>>
>> and two more (symtab.c, and linespec.c) will be coming soon.
>>
>> ---
>>
>> A new year brings a final push to get Objective-C support in gdb. This
>> patch enables compilation and linking of the Objective-C files. I need
>> this now since the remaining patches require so many of the 
>> Objective-C
>> functions that it would be pointless to submit them otherwise.
>>
>> 2003-01-02  Adam Fedor  <fedor@gnu.org>
>>
>> 	* Makefile.in (COMMON_OBS): Add objc-lang.o
>> 	(YYOBJ): Add objc-exp.tab.o
>> 	(maint.o, utils.o): Add $(objc_lang_h)
>> 	* maint.c (maintenance_demangle): Uncomment language_objc case.
>> 	* utils.c (fprintf_symbol_filtered): Likewise.
>> 	* parser-defs.h (start_msglist, add_msglist, end_msglist): Declare
>> 	Objective-C parsing functions (from objc-lang.c).
>
>
> I think this is just 'obvious' in a sense given the code has been
> already approved, and it is just dormant.  However, do we have
> testcases already? I think we should have a gdb.objc
> subdirectory. (sorry, i don't remember if you posted them).  I would
> feel uncomfortable enabling objc w/o having tests, even very simple
> ones, it could bitrot fast.
>
>

Yes I have one. I was going to wait till all the patches were in, 
since, AFAIK most of the tests won't pass until all my patches are in.

How should I submit it? I suppose it would have to be a tar file.