Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
Cc: Adam Fedor <fedor@doc.com>, GDB Patches <gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFA] Compile objc-lang.c, objc-exp.tab.c [1/5]
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 22:13:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3E7A3D14.1020100@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030320213945.GA17345@nevyn.them.org>

> Not without some substantial thought.  We use cplus_demangle in a lot
> of places where we don't even know what the language is supposed to be
> - for minsyms, during lookups, et cetera.
> 
> Certainly it needs to be thought about.  At least objc's mangling is
> probably not entirely ambiguous with C++/Java's?  I don't know.
> 
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 04:27:02PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> 
>> Daniel,
>> 
>> Would it be possible to make the cplus_demangle() method part of the 
>> language vector?  That way code like the patch below could be reduced to:
>> 
>> 	/* Return demangled language symbol, or NULL.  */
>> 	language_demangle (current_language, arg);
>> 
>> This would in turn allow Adam to just add an equivalent objc_demangle() 
>> method to the objc language vector, and hence eliminate the need to 
>> always link in objc-lang.c.

As well as then?  The places where objc is adding calls to the demangler 
the language is known.

Andrew



  reply	other threads:[~2003-03-20 22:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-01-03 22:06 Adam Fedor
2003-02-19 19:02 ` Elena Zannoni
2003-02-19 20:27   ` Adam Fedor
2003-02-19 21:11     ` Elena Zannoni
2003-03-20 21:27 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-03-20 21:39   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-03-20 22:13     ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2003-03-20 22:19       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-03-31  2:23         ` Adam Fedor
2003-03-31 22:39           ` Andrew Cagney
2003-03-31 22:53           ` David Carlton
2003-03-31 23:03             ` David Carlton
2003-03-31 23:15             ` Adam Fedor
2003-04-01  0:31               ` Andrew Cagney
2003-04-01  0:45                 ` David Carlton
2003-04-01  4:09                 ` Adam Fedor
2003-04-01 21:31                   ` David Carlton
2003-04-01 21:38                   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-03-20 22:22     ` David Ayers
2003-03-20 21:35 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-03-24 17:46   ` Adam Fedor
2003-03-24 18:25     ` Andrew Cagney
2003-03-25  2:23       ` Adam Fedor

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3E7A3D14.1020100@redhat.com \
    --to=ac131313@redhat.com \
    --cc=drow@mvista.com \
    --cc=fedor@doc.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox