From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
Cc: Adam Fedor <fedor@doc.com>, GDB Patches <gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFA] Compile objc-lang.c, objc-exp.tab.c [1/5]
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 22:13:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3E7A3D14.1020100@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030320213945.GA17345@nevyn.them.org>
> Not without some substantial thought. We use cplus_demangle in a lot
> of places where we don't even know what the language is supposed to be
> - for minsyms, during lookups, et cetera.
>
> Certainly it needs to be thought about. At least objc's mangling is
> probably not entirely ambiguous with C++/Java's? I don't know.
>
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 04:27:02PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>
>> Daniel,
>>
>> Would it be possible to make the cplus_demangle() method part of the
>> language vector? That way code like the patch below could be reduced to:
>>
>> /* Return demangled language symbol, or NULL. */
>> language_demangle (current_language, arg);
>>
>> This would in turn allow Adam to just add an equivalent objc_demangle()
>> method to the objc language vector, and hence eliminate the need to
>> always link in objc-lang.c.
As well as then? The places where objc is adding calls to the demangler
the language is known.
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-20 22:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-01-03 22:06 Adam Fedor
2003-02-19 19:02 ` Elena Zannoni
2003-02-19 20:27 ` Adam Fedor
2003-02-19 21:11 ` Elena Zannoni
2003-03-20 21:27 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-03-20 21:39 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-03-20 22:13 ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2003-03-20 22:19 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-03-31 2:23 ` Adam Fedor
2003-03-31 22:39 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-03-31 22:53 ` David Carlton
2003-03-31 23:03 ` David Carlton
2003-03-31 23:15 ` Adam Fedor
2003-04-01 0:31 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-04-01 0:45 ` David Carlton
2003-04-01 4:09 ` Adam Fedor
2003-04-01 21:31 ` David Carlton
2003-04-01 21:38 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-03-20 22:22 ` David Ayers
2003-03-20 21:35 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-03-24 17:46 ` Adam Fedor
2003-03-24 18:25 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-03-25 2:23 ` Adam Fedor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3E7A3D14.1020100@redhat.com \
--to=ac131313@redhat.com \
--cc=drow@mvista.com \
--cc=fedor@doc.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox