Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
To: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org,  Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, gdb/exp] Handle DW_OP_GNU_variable_value refs to abstract dies
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2018 03:46:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87sh2nwaon.fsf@tromey.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180904145449.2cf6a099@pinnacle.lan> (Kevin Buettner's message	of "Tue, 4 Sep 2018 14:54:49 -0700")

>>>>> "Kevin" == Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com> writes:

Kevin> Is there a good reason to use VEC instead of std::vector?  I know that
Kevin> there have been a number of patches which have been replacing VEC
Kevin> with std:vector.  So, unless there's a compelling reason to use VEC,
Kevin> we might as well use std:vector here and save someone else the effort
Kevin> of changing this use of VEC later on.

Thanks for this note.  One of my gdb c++-ification/cleanup goals is to
get rid of VEC.

Tom


  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-09-06  3:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-03  4:04 [PATCH 0/3] Add support for DW_OP_GNU_variable_value Kevin Buettner
2018-08-03  4:18 ` [PATCH 1/3] " Kevin Buettner
2018-08-03 18:36   ` Tom Tromey
2018-08-18 20:32     ` Kevin Buettner
2018-08-22 15:35       ` Tom de Vries
2018-08-23 21:12         ` Kevin Buettner
2018-08-24 13:09           ` [RFC, gdb/exp] Handle DW_OP_GNU_variable_value refs to abstract dies Tom de Vries
2018-08-24 13:18             ` Richard Biener
2018-09-04 10:17             ` [PATCH, " Tom de Vries
2018-09-04 13:06               ` Tom de Vries
2018-09-04 21:54                 ` Kevin Buettner
2018-09-05 10:53                   ` Tom de Vries
2018-09-06  3:46                   ` Tom Tromey [this message]
2018-09-06  6:40                     ` Tom de Vries
2018-09-06 13:11                       ` Tom Tromey
2018-08-03 18:43   ` [PATCH 1/3] Add support for DW_OP_GNU_variable_value Tom Tromey
2018-08-03  4:19 ` [PATCH 2/3] Add support of DW_OP_GNU_variable_value to DWARF assembler Kevin Buettner
2018-08-03 18:37   ` Tom Tromey
2018-08-18 20:32     ` Kevin Buettner
2018-08-03  4:22 ` [PATCH 3/3] Test case for DW_OP_GNU_variable_value Kevin Buettner
2018-08-03 18:40   ` Tom Tromey
2018-08-18 20:32     ` Kevin Buettner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87sh2nwaon.fsf@tromey.com \
    --to=tom@tromey.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=kevinb@redhat.com \
    --cc=tdevries@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox