Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
To: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>,
	Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Add support for DW_OP_GNU_variable_value
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2018 15:35:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <93529546-71b0-4268-880a-79b00062ecd2@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180818133158.7e5b4dcb@pinnacle.lan>

On 08/18/2018 10:31 PM, Kevin Buettner wrote:
>     This patch adds support for DW_OP_GNU_variable_value to GDB.
>     
>     Jakub Jelinek provides a fairly expansive discussion of this DWARF
>     expression opcode in his GCC patch...
>     
>         https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-02/msg01499.html
>     
>     It has also been proposed for addition to the DWARF Standard:
>     
>         http://www.dwarfstd.org/ShowIssue.php?issue=161109.2

Hi,

AFAIU from the discussion here (
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-08/msg01351.html ) if:
- a DW_OP_GNU_variable_value refers to a die 'a', and
- there's a die 'b' with abstract_origin 'a' that does have a
  DW_AT_location, and
- die 'b' is 'in scope' in an evaluation context,
then the evaluation of DW_OP_GNU_variable_value 'a' should return the
value found at the DW_AT_location of die 'b'.

I've written a gcc demonstrator patch to generate code like this for
VLAs, and found that gdb master (containing this patch series) does not
support this.

Is this further support of DW_OP_GNU_variable_value something you're
currently working on, or plan to work on?

Thanks,
- Tom


  reply	other threads:[~2018-08-22 15:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-03  4:04 [PATCH 0/3] " Kevin Buettner
2018-08-03  4:18 ` [PATCH 1/3] " Kevin Buettner
2018-08-03 18:36   ` Tom Tromey
2018-08-18 20:32     ` Kevin Buettner
2018-08-22 15:35       ` Tom de Vries [this message]
2018-08-23 21:12         ` Kevin Buettner
2018-08-24 13:09           ` [RFC, gdb/exp] Handle DW_OP_GNU_variable_value refs to abstract dies Tom de Vries
2018-08-24 13:18             ` Richard Biener
2018-09-04 10:17             ` [PATCH, " Tom de Vries
2018-09-04 13:06               ` Tom de Vries
2018-09-04 21:54                 ` Kevin Buettner
2018-09-05 10:53                   ` Tom de Vries
2018-09-06  3:46                   ` Tom Tromey
2018-09-06  6:40                     ` Tom de Vries
2018-09-06 13:11                       ` Tom Tromey
2018-08-03 18:43   ` [PATCH 1/3] Add support for DW_OP_GNU_variable_value Tom Tromey
2018-08-03  4:19 ` [PATCH 2/3] Add support of DW_OP_GNU_variable_value to DWARF assembler Kevin Buettner
2018-08-03 18:37   ` Tom Tromey
2018-08-18 20:32     ` Kevin Buettner
2018-08-03  4:22 ` [PATCH 3/3] Test case for DW_OP_GNU_variable_value Kevin Buettner
2018-08-03 18:40   ` Tom Tromey
2018-08-18 20:32     ` Kevin Buettner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=93529546-71b0-4268-880a-79b00062ecd2@suse.de \
    --to=tdevries@suse.de \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=kevinb@redhat.com \
    --cc=rguenther@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox