From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 45641 invoked by alias); 6 Sep 2018 03:46:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 45622 invoked by uid 89); 6 Sep 2018 03:46:08 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=goals X-HELO: gateway34.websitewelcome.com Received: from gateway34.websitewelcome.com (HELO gateway34.websitewelcome.com) (192.185.149.101) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Sep 2018 03:46:06 +0000 Received: from cm15.websitewelcome.com (cm15.websitewelcome.com [100.42.49.9]) by gateway34.websitewelcome.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55D1C6536B0 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2018 22:46:05 -0500 (CDT) Received: from box5379.bluehost.com ([162.241.216.53]) by cmsmtp with SMTP id xlEoffYi0bXuJxlEzfzbcj; Wed, 05 Sep 2018 22:46:04 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tromey.com; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=6P6bMleARGXMTdJ0r2/gRGeNi4ZA+oeVoV709y1dr5Y=; b=p4yZoVUYTEA0gQ5uxZ/lblmL4o +LJ76fPzhrrz2O7m0SQ4OCjkOSdl7ol5iCG1kiriQEvt5U/MTMKHvpK6Cu6J/s51q/j7eoJJMHgSP NKOtbLPILqiNjuG0TLtIDqt4X; Received: from 75-166-85-72.hlrn.qwest.net ([75.166.85.72]:40974 helo=pokyo) by box5379.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1fxlEn-001RfU-Me; Wed, 05 Sep 2018 22:45:45 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Kevin Buettner Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Tom de Vries Subject: Re: [PATCH, gdb/exp] Handle DW_OP_GNU_variable_value refs to abstract dies References: <20180802210405.5c04ca7a@pinnacle.lan> <20180802211754.40a529c2@pinnacle.lan> <87o9ej1emk.fsf@tromey.com> <20180818133158.7e5b4dcb@pinnacle.lan> <93529546-71b0-4268-880a-79b00062ecd2@suse.de> <20180823141240.577345e0@pinnacle.lan> <982919b5-93ba-3840-5839-6accc904b459@suse.de> <5e6ac298-bf8f-6957-984a-67bb58b62be9@suse.de> <95697ec8-30e2-acaf-60fd-e46524f88e72@suse.de> <20180904145449.2cf6a099@pinnacle.lan> Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2018 03:46:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20180904145449.2cf6a099@pinnacle.lan> (Kevin Buettner's message of "Tue, 4 Sep 2018 14:54:49 -0700") Message-ID: <87sh2nwaon.fsf@tromey.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2018-09/txt/msg00084.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Kevin" == Kevin Buettner writes: Kevin> Is there a good reason to use VEC instead of std::vector? I know that Kevin> there have been a number of patches which have been replacing VEC Kevin> with std:vector. So, unless there's a compelling reason to use VEC, Kevin> we might as well use std:vector here and save someone else the effort Kevin> of changing this use of VEC later on. Thanks for this note. One of my gdb c++-ification/cleanup goals is to get rid of VEC. Tom