From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: Keith Seitz <keiths@redhat.com>
Cc: "gdb-patches\@sourceware.org ml" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [RFA 1/2] Linespec rewrite (update 2)
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 16:37:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r4waqc38.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F75D859.1010907@redhat.com> (Keith Seitz's message of "Fri, 30 Mar 2012 08:59:21 -0700")
>>>>> "Keith" == Keith Seitz <keiths@redhat.com> writes:
Tom> What is the rationale for having a linespec where parts are ignored?
Tom> I couldn't think of a use for it. And, if current cvs rejects it, then
Tom> it seems like it is interfering with a useful future feature as well.
Keith> I agree, but perhaps I simply misunderstood Joel?
Keith> http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2012-03/msg00904.html
I read the followup more as a request for the feature to be added:
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2012-03/msg00907.html
However, I think that it is better to have this patch be as
behavior-unchanging as reasonably possible and leave feature additions
for follow-up patches.
Tom
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-30 16:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-26 23:18 Keith Seitz
2012-03-27 1:45 ` asmwarrior
2012-03-28 18:55 ` Tom Tromey
2012-03-27 13:56 ` Joel Brobecker
2012-03-27 14:31 ` Keith Seitz
2012-03-27 14:54 ` Joel Brobecker
2012-03-27 15:05 ` Joel Brobecker
2012-03-27 18:08 ` Keith Seitz
2012-03-28 20:46 ` Tom Tromey
2012-03-29 19:18 ` Keith Seitz
2012-03-30 15:34 ` Tom Tromey
2012-03-30 15:59 ` Keith Seitz
2012-03-30 16:37 ` Tom Tromey [this message]
2012-03-30 17:09 ` Joel Brobecker
2012-03-30 17:56 ` Tom Tromey
2012-03-30 18:05 ` Keith Seitz
2012-04-03 23:22 ` Keith Seitz
2012-04-05 15:22 ` Tom Tromey
2012-04-05 15:55 ` Doug Evans
2012-04-05 19:01 ` Keith Seitz
2012-07-22 19:33 ` Andreas Schwab
2012-07-23 17:57 ` Keith Seitz
2012-07-23 18:55 ` Tom Tromey
2012-07-23 21:13 ` Keith Seitz
2012-04-03 21:19 ` Doug Evans
2012-04-03 23:14 ` Keith Seitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87r4waqc38.fsf@fleche.redhat.com \
--to=tromey@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=keiths@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox