* [PATCH 0/4] [gdb/testsuite] Fix some more dwarf assembly test-cases
@ 2026-05-22 14:37 Tom de Vries
2026-05-22 14:37 ` [PATCH 1/4] [gdb/testsuite] Remove invalid .debug_line section in gdb.dwarf2/dw2-icycle.exp Tom de Vries
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Tom de Vries @ 2026-05-22 14:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches
Three more patches fixing warnings with readelf -w or llvm-dwarfdump -a in
dwarf assembly test-cases.
In the process, I found a problem in readelf, fixed by commit 1678d7d3d2e
("[binutils] Handle implicit const in .debug_names").
The last patch doesn't fix a warning, but fixes comments related to implicit
const in generated dwarf assembly.
Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34157
Tom de Vries (4):
[gdb/testsuite] Remove invalid .debug_line section in
gdb.dwarf2/dw2-icycle.exp
[gdb/testsuite] Complete 64-bit port of
gdb.dwarf2/dw2-skip-prologue.exp
[gdb/testsuite] Add missing type_offset in
gdb.dwarf/debug-names-tu.exp
[gdb/testsuite] Improve dwarf assembly for implicit const in
.debug_names
.../gdb.dwarf2/debug-names-bad-cu-index.exp | 6 ++--
.../gdb.dwarf2/debug-names-tu.exp.tcl | 6 ++--
gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-const.S | 18 +++++++++---
gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-const.exp | 12 +++++++-
gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-icycle.S | 4 ---
gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-skip-prologue.S | 28 ++++++++++---------
gdb/testsuite/lib/dwarf.exp | 5 ++--
7 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
base-commit: 1678d7d3d2e4cf83cda5a96334a0326573ad0f7c
--
2.51.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* [PATCH 1/4] [gdb/testsuite] Remove invalid .debug_line section in gdb.dwarf2/dw2-icycle.exp 2026-05-22 14:37 [PATCH 0/4] [gdb/testsuite] Fix some more dwarf assembly test-cases Tom de Vries @ 2026-05-22 14:37 ` Tom de Vries 2026-05-22 14:55 ` Tom Tromey 2026-05-22 14:37 ` [PATCH 2/4] [gdb/testsuite] Complete 64-bit port of gdb.dwarf2/dw2-skip-prologue.exp Tom de Vries ` (2 subsequent siblings) 3 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Tom de Vries @ 2026-05-22 14:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gdb-patches Test-case source gdb.dwarf2/dw2-icycle.S contains an invalid .debug_line section contribution, causing a readelf -w warning. It's also unused, so fix the warning by removing it. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34157 --- gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-icycle.S | 4 ---- 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-icycle.S b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-icycle.S index 3e79c966aef..4bd67a4cb7d 100644 --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-icycle.S +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-icycle.S @@ -250,10 +250,6 @@ p__top: .byte 0 .byte 0 - .section .debug_line -.Lline1_begin: - .byte 0 - #ifdef __arm__ .section .note.GNU-stack,"",%progbits #else -- 2.51.0 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/4] [gdb/testsuite] Remove invalid .debug_line section in gdb.dwarf2/dw2-icycle.exp 2026-05-22 14:37 ` [PATCH 1/4] [gdb/testsuite] Remove invalid .debug_line section in gdb.dwarf2/dw2-icycle.exp Tom de Vries @ 2026-05-22 14:55 ` Tom Tromey 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Tom Tromey @ 2026-05-22 14:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Tom de Vries; +Cc: gdb-patches >>>>> "Tom" == Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de> writes: Tom> Test-case source gdb.dwarf2/dw2-icycle.S contains an invalid .debug_line Tom> section contribution, causing a readelf -w warning. Tom> It's also unused, so fix the warning by removing it. Looks good. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com> Tom ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/4] [gdb/testsuite] Complete 64-bit port of gdb.dwarf2/dw2-skip-prologue.exp 2026-05-22 14:37 [PATCH 0/4] [gdb/testsuite] Fix some more dwarf assembly test-cases Tom de Vries 2026-05-22 14:37 ` [PATCH 1/4] [gdb/testsuite] Remove invalid .debug_line section in gdb.dwarf2/dw2-icycle.exp Tom de Vries @ 2026-05-22 14:37 ` Tom de Vries 2026-05-22 15:07 ` Tom Tromey 2026-05-22 14:37 ` [PATCH 3/4] [gdb/testsuite] Add missing type_offset in gdb.dwarf/debug-names-tu.exp Tom de Vries 2026-05-22 14:37 ` [PATCH 4/4] [gdb/testsuite] Improve dwarf assembly for implicit const in .debug_names Tom de Vries 3 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Tom de Vries @ 2026-05-22 14:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gdb-patches Test-source gdb.dwarf2/dw2-skip-prologue.S was generated using 32-bit, and subsequently ported to 64-bit using macro PTRBYTE. When using 64-bit, there are some readelf -w warnings because the port to 64-bit is not complete. Fix these warnings. Likewise in gdb.dwarf/dw2-const.exp. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34157 --- gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-const.S | 18 ++++++++++--- gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-const.exp | 12 ++++++++- gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-skip-prologue.S | 28 +++++++++++--------- 3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-const.S b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-const.S index 94cf1acbed6..1161633f181 100644 --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-const.S +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-const.S @@ -15,6 +15,16 @@ You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. */ +#if PTRBITS == 64 +# define PTRBYTE .8byte +# define PTRBYTES 8 +#elif PTRBITS == 32 +# define PTRBYTE .4byte +# define PTRBYTES 4 +#else +# error "Unsupported pointer size" +#endif + /* Dummy function to provide debug information for. */ .text @@ -228,9 +238,9 @@ func_cu1: .Lline1_lines: .byte 0 /* DW_LNE_set_address */ - .uleb128 5 + .uleb128 1 + PTRBYTES .byte 2 - .4byte .Lbegin_func_cu1 + PTRBYTE .Lbegin_func_cu1 .byte 3 /* DW_LNS_advance_line */ .sleb128 3 /* ... to 4 */ @@ -240,9 +250,9 @@ func_cu1: .byte 1 /* DW_LNS_copy (second time as an end-of-prologue marker) */ .byte 0 /* DW_LNE_set_address */ - .uleb128 5 + .uleb128 1 + PTRBYTES .byte 2 - .4byte .Lend_func_cu1 + PTRBYTE .Lend_func_cu1 .byte 0 /* DW_LNE_end_of_sequence */ .uleb128 1 diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-const.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-const.exp index 93ddfaa0f2f..f855659f8bd 100644 --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-const.exp +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-const.exp @@ -19,8 +19,18 @@ require dwarf2_support standard_testfile .S +if {[is_ilp32_target]} { + set ptrbits 32 +} else { + set ptrbits 64 +} + +set srcfile_opts {} +lappend srcfile_opts nodebug +lappend srcfile_opts additional_flags=-DPTRBITS=$ptrbits + if {[prepare_for_testing_full "failed to prepare" \ - [list $testfile debug main.c debug $srcfile nodebug]]} { + [list $testfile debug main.c debug $srcfile $srcfile_opts]]} { return } diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-skip-prologue.S b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-skip-prologue.S index 19165a513a4..11d794bc412 100644 --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-skip-prologue.S +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-skip-prologue.S @@ -17,8 +17,10 @@ #if PTRBITS == 64 # define PTRBYTE .8byte +# define PTRBYTES 8 #elif PTRBITS == 32 # define PTRBYTE .4byte +# define PTRBYTES 4 #else # error "Unsupported pointer size" #endif @@ -130,7 +132,7 @@ loclist: 1: .byte 0x50 /* DW_OP_reg0 */ 2: /* Location list end. */ - .4byte 0, 0 + PTRBYTE 0, 0 /* Abbrev table */ .section .debug_abbrev @@ -283,7 +285,7 @@ loclist: .Lline1_lines: .byte 0 /* DW_LNE_set_address */ - .uleb128 5 + .uleb128 1 + PTRBYTES .byte 2 PTRBYTE func_start .byte 3 /* DW_LNS_advance_line */ @@ -291,7 +293,7 @@ loclist: .byte 1 /* DW_LNS_copy */ .byte 0 /* DW_LNE_set_address */ - .uleb128 5 + .uleb128 1 + PTRBYTES .byte 2 PTRBYTE func0 .byte 4 /* DW_LNS_set_file */ @@ -301,7 +303,7 @@ loclist: .byte 1 /* DW_LNS_copy */ .byte 0 /* DW_LNE_set_address */ - .uleb128 5 + .uleb128 1 + PTRBYTES .byte 2 PTRBYTE func1 .byte 4 /* DW_LNS_set_file */ @@ -311,7 +313,7 @@ loclist: .byte 1 /* DW_LNS_copy */ .byte 0 /* DW_LNE_set_address */ - .uleb128 5 + .uleb128 1 + PTRBYTES .byte 2 PTRBYTE func2 .byte 4 /* DW_LNS_set_file */ @@ -321,7 +323,7 @@ loclist: .byte 1 /* DW_LNS_copy */ .byte 0 /* DW_LNE_set_address */ - .uleb128 5 + .uleb128 1 + PTRBYTES .byte 2 PTRBYTE func3 .byte 4 /* DW_LNS_set_file */ @@ -331,14 +333,14 @@ loclist: .byte 1 /* DW_LNS_copy */ .byte 0 /* DW_LNE_set_address */ - .uleb128 5 + .uleb128 1 + PTRBYTES .byte 2 PTRBYTE func_end /* Equivalent copy but renamed s/func/fund/. */ .byte 0 /* DW_LNE_set_address */ - .uleb128 5 + .uleb128 1 + PTRBYTES .byte 2 PTRBYTE fund_start .byte 3 /* DW_LNS_advance_line */ @@ -346,7 +348,7 @@ loclist: .byte 1 /* DW_LNS_copy */ .byte 0 /* DW_LNE_set_address */ - .uleb128 5 + .uleb128 1 + PTRBYTES .byte 2 PTRBYTE fund0 .byte 4 /* DW_LNS_set_file */ @@ -356,7 +358,7 @@ loclist: .byte 1 /* DW_LNS_copy */ .byte 0 /* DW_LNE_set_address */ - .uleb128 5 + .uleb128 1 + PTRBYTES .byte 2 PTRBYTE fund1 .byte 4 /* DW_LNS_set_file */ @@ -366,7 +368,7 @@ loclist: .byte 1 /* DW_LNS_copy */ .byte 0 /* DW_LNE_set_address */ - .uleb128 5 + .uleb128 1 + PTRBYTES .byte 2 PTRBYTE fund2 .byte 4 /* DW_LNS_set_file */ @@ -376,7 +378,7 @@ loclist: .byte 1 /* DW_LNS_copy */ .byte 0 /* DW_LNE_set_address */ - .uleb128 5 + .uleb128 1 + PTRBYTES .byte 2 PTRBYTE fund3 .byte 4 /* DW_LNS_set_file */ @@ -386,7 +388,7 @@ loclist: .byte 1 /* DW_LNS_copy */ .byte 0 /* DW_LNE_set_address */ - .uleb128 5 + .uleb128 1 + PTRBYTES .byte 2 PTRBYTE fund_end -- 2.51.0 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/4] [gdb/testsuite] Complete 64-bit port of gdb.dwarf2/dw2-skip-prologue.exp 2026-05-22 14:37 ` [PATCH 2/4] [gdb/testsuite] Complete 64-bit port of gdb.dwarf2/dw2-skip-prologue.exp Tom de Vries @ 2026-05-22 15:07 ` Tom Tromey 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Tom Tromey @ 2026-05-22 15:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Tom de Vries; +Cc: gdb-patches >>>>> "Tom" == Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de> writes: Tom> Test-source gdb.dwarf2/dw2-skip-prologue.S was generated using 32-bit, and Tom> subsequently ported to 64-bit using macro PTRBYTE. Tom> When using 64-bit, there are some readelf -w warnings because the port to Tom> 64-bit is not complete. Fix these warnings. Tom> Likewise in gdb.dwarf/dw2-const.exp. This looks good. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com> I may try converting dw2-const.exp to the DWARF assembler. dw2-skip-prologue sounds harder, based on the name at least. Tom ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 3/4] [gdb/testsuite] Add missing type_offset in gdb.dwarf/debug-names-tu.exp 2026-05-22 14:37 [PATCH 0/4] [gdb/testsuite] Fix some more dwarf assembly test-cases Tom de Vries 2026-05-22 14:37 ` [PATCH 1/4] [gdb/testsuite] Remove invalid .debug_line section in gdb.dwarf2/dw2-icycle.exp Tom de Vries 2026-05-22 14:37 ` [PATCH 2/4] [gdb/testsuite] Complete 64-bit port of gdb.dwarf2/dw2-skip-prologue.exp Tom de Vries @ 2026-05-22 14:37 ` Tom de Vries 2026-05-22 15:03 ` Tom Tromey 2026-05-22 14:37 ` [PATCH 4/4] [gdb/testsuite] Improve dwarf assembly for implicit const in .debug_names Tom de Vries 3 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Tom de Vries @ 2026-05-22 14:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gdb-patches With llvm-dwarfdump we run into this warning: ... $ llvm-dwarfdump -a -v debug-names-tu > /dev/null warning: DWARF type unit at offset 0x00000028 has its relocated type_offset \ 0x00000028 pointing inside the header ... Fix this by adding the missing type_offset. Likewise in gdb.dwarf2/debug-names-bad-cu-index.exp. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34157 --- gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/debug-names-bad-cu-index.exp | 6 ++++-- gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/debug-names-tu.exp.tcl | 6 ++++-- 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/debug-names-bad-cu-index.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/debug-names-bad-cu-index.exp index 10e649f06af..5d31414ba29 100644 --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/debug-names-bad-cu-index.exp +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/debug-names-bad-cu-index.exp @@ -34,6 +34,8 @@ Dwarf::assemble { global $var } + declare_labels type_offset + cu { label cu_label } { compile_unit { DW_AT_language @DW_LANG_C @@ -47,11 +49,11 @@ Dwarf::assemble { } } - tu { label tu_label } 0x8ece66f4224fddb3 "" { + tu { label tu_label } 0x8ece66f4224fddb3 type_offset { type_unit {} { declare_labels int_type - structure_type { + type_offset: structure_type { DW_AT_name struct_with_int_member DW_AT_byte_size 4 sdata } { diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/debug-names-tu.exp.tcl b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/debug-names-tu.exp.tcl index af3f263a273..bd48df6a894 100644 --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/debug-names-tu.exp.tcl +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/debug-names-tu.exp.tcl @@ -39,6 +39,8 @@ Dwarf::assemble { global $var } + declare_labels type_label + cu { label cu_label version $dwarf_version } { compile_unit { DW_AT_language @DW_LANG_C @@ -52,13 +54,13 @@ Dwarf::assemble { } } - tu { label tu_label version $dwarf_version } 0x8ece66f4224fddb3 "" { + tu { label tu_label version $dwarf_version } 0x8ece66f4224fddb3 type_label { type_unit { DW_AT_language @DW_LANG_C } { declare_labels int_type - structure_type { + type_label: structure_type { DW_AT_name struct_with_int_member DW_AT_byte_size 4 sdata } { -- 2.51.0 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 3/4] [gdb/testsuite] Add missing type_offset in gdb.dwarf/debug-names-tu.exp 2026-05-22 14:37 ` [PATCH 3/4] [gdb/testsuite] Add missing type_offset in gdb.dwarf/debug-names-tu.exp Tom de Vries @ 2026-05-22 15:03 ` Tom Tromey 2026-05-23 8:15 ` Tom de Vries 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Tom Tromey @ 2026-05-22 15:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Tom de Vries; +Cc: gdb-patches >>>>> "Tom" == Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de> writes: Tom> With llvm-dwarfdump we run into this warning: Tom> ... Tom> $ llvm-dwarfdump -a -v debug-names-tu > /dev/null Tom> warning: DWARF type unit at offset 0x00000028 has its relocated type_offset \ Tom> 0x00000028 pointing inside the header Tom> ... Tom> Fix this by adding the missing type_offset. Tom> Likewise in gdb.dwarf2/debug-names-bad-cu-index.exp. Tom> Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34157 This looks good but I wonder if the type offset should simply be mandatory to 'proc tu'? Like should it reject an empty string and require a real label? Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com> Tom ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 3/4] [gdb/testsuite] Add missing type_offset in gdb.dwarf/debug-names-tu.exp 2026-05-22 15:03 ` Tom Tromey @ 2026-05-23 8:15 ` Tom de Vries 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Tom de Vries @ 2026-05-23 8:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Tom Tromey; +Cc: gdb-patches On 5/22/26 5:03 PM, Tom Tromey wrote: >>>>>> "Tom" == Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de> writes: > > Tom> With llvm-dwarfdump we run into this warning: > Tom> ... > Tom> $ llvm-dwarfdump -a -v debug-names-tu > /dev/null > Tom> warning: DWARF type unit at offset 0x00000028 has its relocated type_offset \ > Tom> 0x00000028 pointing inside the header > Tom> ... > > Tom> Fix this by adding the missing type_offset. > > Tom> Likewise in gdb.dwarf2/debug-names-bad-cu-index.exp. > > Tom> Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34157 > > This looks good but I wonder if the type offset should simply be > mandatory to 'proc tu'? Like should it reject an empty string and > require a real label? > I came across fission-type-unit-locexpr.exp, which has: ... # Stub for "int" type unit. tu { version 4 } 0xCAFE1 "" { type_unit { DW_AT_GNU_dwo_name ${::gdb_test_file_name}.dwo DW_FORM_strp DW_AT_comp_dir ${outdir} } { } } ... We could fix this by doing: ... + declare_labels none1 # Stub for "int" type unit. tu { version 4 - } 0xCAFE1 "" { + } 0xCAFE1 none1 { type_unit { DW_AT_GNU_dwo_name ${::gdb_test_file_name}.dwo DW_FORM_strp DW_AT_comp_dir ${outdir} } { + none1: } } ... and indeed that fixes the warning, but eventually there might be another warning complaining about that (points to abbrev number 0 instead of type). So I left this as is. Thanks, - Tom > Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com> > > Tom ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/4] [gdb/testsuite] Improve dwarf assembly for implicit const in .debug_names 2026-05-22 14:37 [PATCH 0/4] [gdb/testsuite] Fix some more dwarf assembly test-cases Tom de Vries ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2026-05-22 14:37 ` [PATCH 3/4] [gdb/testsuite] Add missing type_offset in gdb.dwarf/debug-names-tu.exp Tom de Vries @ 2026-05-22 14:37 ` Tom de Vries 2026-05-22 14:54 ` Tom Tromey 3 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Tom de Vries @ 2026-05-22 14:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gdb-patches In the assembly generated for the dwarf assembly for test-case gdb.dwarf2/debug-names-tu-dwarf5.exp, there's this bit: ... .uleb128 0x2003 /* DW_IDX_GNU_language */ .uleb128 0x21 /* DW_FORM_flag_present */ .sleb128 0x0002 /* DW_LANG_C */ ... As it happens, 0x21 is not DW_FORM_flag_present, but DW_FORM_implicit_const, and the following entry is the value of the attribute. Fix the comment, and make the relation between the two entries more clear by printing: ... .uleb128 0x2003 /* DW_IDX_GNU_language */ .uleb128 0x21 /* DW_FORM_implicit_const */ .sleb128 0x0002 /* DW_FORM_implicit_const value: DW_LANG_C */ ... --- gdb/testsuite/lib/dwarf.exp | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/lib/dwarf.exp b/gdb/testsuite/lib/dwarf.exp index 5358dc317a1..9575f4b0b1c 100644 --- a/gdb/testsuite/lib/dwarf.exp +++ b/gdb/testsuite/lib/dwarf.exp @@ -3636,8 +3636,9 @@ namespace eval Dwarf { _op .uleb128 $_constants(DW_IDX_GNU_language) \ "DW_IDX_GNU_language" _op .uleb128 $_constants(DW_FORM_implicit_const) \ - "DW_FORM_flag_present" - _op .sleb128 $_constants($word) $word + "DW_FORM_implicit_const" + _op .sleb128 $_constants($word) \ + "DW_FORM_implicit_const value: $word" } else { error "unrecognized extra keyword $word" } -- 2.51.0 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 4/4] [gdb/testsuite] Improve dwarf assembly for implicit const in .debug_names 2026-05-22 14:37 ` [PATCH 4/4] [gdb/testsuite] Improve dwarf assembly for implicit const in .debug_names Tom de Vries @ 2026-05-22 14:54 ` Tom Tromey 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Tom Tromey @ 2026-05-22 14:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Tom de Vries; +Cc: gdb-patches >>>>> "Tom" == Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de> writes: Tom> Fix the comment, and make the relation between the two entries more clear by Tom> printing: Tom> ... Tom> .uleb128 0x2003 /* DW_IDX_GNU_language */ Tom> .uleb128 0x21 /* DW_FORM_implicit_const */ Tom> .sleb128 0x0002 /* DW_FORM_implicit_const value: DW_LANG_C */ Thank you. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com> Tom ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-05-23 8:16 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2026-05-22 14:37 [PATCH 0/4] [gdb/testsuite] Fix some more dwarf assembly test-cases Tom de Vries 2026-05-22 14:37 ` [PATCH 1/4] [gdb/testsuite] Remove invalid .debug_line section in gdb.dwarf2/dw2-icycle.exp Tom de Vries 2026-05-22 14:55 ` Tom Tromey 2026-05-22 14:37 ` [PATCH 2/4] [gdb/testsuite] Complete 64-bit port of gdb.dwarf2/dw2-skip-prologue.exp Tom de Vries 2026-05-22 15:07 ` Tom Tromey 2026-05-22 14:37 ` [PATCH 3/4] [gdb/testsuite] Add missing type_offset in gdb.dwarf/debug-names-tu.exp Tom de Vries 2026-05-22 15:03 ` Tom Tromey 2026-05-23 8:15 ` Tom de Vries 2026-05-22 14:37 ` [PATCH 4/4] [gdb/testsuite] Improve dwarf assembly for implicit const in .debug_names Tom de Vries 2026-05-22 14:54 ` Tom Tromey
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox