From: Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: "Jose E. Marchesi" <jose.marchesi@oracle.com>,
Doug Evans <dje@google.com>,
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/9] New commands `enable probe' and `disable probe'.
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 00:55:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87mw8vfrb0.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5440649C.6080705@redhat.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Fri, 17 Oct 2014 01:36:44 +0100")
On Thursday, October 16 2014, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On 10/11/2014 07:39 AM, Jose E. Marchesi wrote:
>>
>> (gdb) info probes
>> Provider Name Where Semaphore Enabled Object
>> demo am-main 0x0000000000400c96 n/a /home/jemarch/oracle/usdt/demo
>> demo another 0x0000000000400c8b n/a always /home/jemarch/oracle/usdt/demo
>> demo progress-counter 0x0000000000400c81 n/a no /home/jemarch/oracle/usdt/demo
>>
>> In the example above demo:am-main is a systemtap probe, for which
>> "Enabled" reads n/a. demo:another is a dtrace probe which cannot be
>> disabled (it does not have any associated enabler) and
>> demo:progress-counter is a dtrace probe which is disabled.
>
> Shouldn't we explicitly say which probe is stap, vs dprobe (vs whatever
> other probe type)? Like, either a new column:
This is actually a nice idea, and if I say that I thought about it while
testing the patch, but then forgot to mention, would it seem strange? :-)
> ~~~
> Type Provider Name Where Semaphore Enabled Object
> stap demo am-main 0x0000000000400c96 n/a /home/jemarch/oracle/usdt/demo
> dtrace demo another 0x0000000000400c8b n/a always /home/jemarch/oracle/usdt/demo
> dtrace demo progress-counter 0x0000000000400c81 n/a no /home/jemarch/oracle/usdt/demo
> ~~~
>
> or, sort output by probe type:
I prefer a new column.
> ~~~
> Stap probes:
>
> Type Provider Name Where Semaphore Enabled Object
> stap demo am-main 0x0000000000400c96 n/a /home/jemarch/oracle/usdt/demo
>
> Dtrace probes:
>
> Type Provider Name Where Semaphore Enabled Object
> dtrace demo another 0x0000000000400c8b n/a always /home/jemarch/oracle/usdt/demo
> dtrace demo progress-counter 0x0000000000400c81 n/a no /home/jemarch/oracle/usdt/demo
> ~~~
Thanks.
--
Sergio
GPG key ID: 0x65FC5E36
Please send encrypted e-mail if possible
http://sergiodj.net/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-17 0:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-10 17:18 [PATCH V2 0/9] Add support for DTrace USDT probes to gdb Jose E. Marchesi
2014-10-10 17:18 ` [PATCH V2 9/9] Announce the DTrace USDT probes support in NEWS Jose E. Marchesi
2014-10-10 18:16 ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-10-10 17:18 ` [PATCH V2 7/9] Simple testsuite for DTrace USDT probes Jose E. Marchesi
2014-10-16 22:36 ` Pedro Alves
2014-10-17 12:01 ` Jose E. Marchesi
2014-10-17 12:18 ` Pedro Alves
2014-10-10 17:18 ` [PATCH V2 3/9] New commands `enable probe' and `disable probe' Jose E. Marchesi
2014-10-10 18:15 ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-10-10 22:03 ` Doug Evans
2014-10-11 6:35 ` Jose E. Marchesi
2014-10-13 16:41 ` Doug Evans
2014-10-14 19:02 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2014-10-17 0:07 ` Doug Evans
2014-10-17 0:36 ` Pedro Alves
2014-10-17 0:43 ` Pedro Alves
2014-10-17 2:31 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2014-10-17 11:23 ` Pedro Alves
2014-10-17 0:55 ` Sergio Durigan Junior [this message]
2014-10-17 5:52 ` Jose E. Marchesi
2014-10-11 17:04 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2014-10-14 18:53 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2014-10-15 13:28 ` Jose E. Marchesi
2014-10-10 17:18 ` [PATCH V2 8/9] Documentation for DTrace USDT probes Jose E. Marchesi
2014-10-10 18:18 ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-10-10 17:18 ` [PATCH V2 4/9] New gdbarch functions: dtrace_parse_probe_argument, dtrace_probe_is_enabled, dtrace_enable_probe, dtrace_disable_probe Jose E. Marchesi
2014-10-10 17:18 ` [PATCH V2 2/9] Move `compute_probe_arg' and `compile_probe_arg' to probe.c Jose E. Marchesi
2014-10-10 17:18 ` [PATCH V2 6/9] Support for DTrace USDT probes in x86_64 targets Jose E. Marchesi
2014-10-16 22:07 ` Pedro Alves
2014-10-17 12:35 ` Jose E. Marchesi
2014-10-17 12:42 ` Pedro Alves
2014-10-17 12:47 ` Jose E. Marchesi
2014-10-17 12:53 ` Pedro Alves
2014-10-17 19:48 ` Jose E. Marchesi
2014-10-16 22:07 ` Pedro Alves
2014-10-16 22:17 ` Pedro Alves
2014-10-10 17:18 ` [PATCH V2 5/9] New probe type: DTrace USDT probes Jose E. Marchesi
2014-10-14 19:01 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2014-10-15 13:28 ` Jose E. Marchesi
2014-10-10 17:18 ` [PATCH V2 1/9] Adapt `info probes' to support printing probes of different types Jose E. Marchesi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87mw8vfrb0.fsf@redhat.com \
--to=sergiodj@redhat.com \
--cc=dje@google.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=jose.marchesi@oracle.com \
--cc=palves@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox