From: Pedro Alves <alves.ped@gmail.com>
To: "Jose E. Marchesi" <jose.marchesi@oracle.com>,
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 6/9] Support for DTrace USDT probes in x86_64 targets.
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 22:07:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <544041A7.50802@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1412961772-16249-7-git-send-email-jose.marchesi@oracle.com>
> +amd64_dtrace_probe_is_enabled (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, CORE_ADDR addr)
> +{
> + gdb_byte buf[5];
> + read_memory (addr - 3, buf, 5);
> +
> + /* The instruction sequence used in x86_64 machines for a disabled
> + is-enabled probe is:
> +
> + xor %rax, %rax => 48 33 C0
> + ADDR: nop => 90
> + nop => 90
> +
Please use read_code when reading code, so that these reads go through
the code cache.
> + /* We use the following instruction sequence for disabling an
> + is-enabled probe:
> +
> + xor %rax, %rax; nop; nop => 48 33 C0 90 90
> +
> + Note that ADDR is offset 3 bytes from the beginning of the
> + sequence. */
> +
> + gdb_byte buf[5];
> +
> + buf[0] = 0x48;
> + buf[1] = 0x33;
> + buf[2] = 0xc0;
> + buf[3] = 0x90;
> + buf[4] = 0x90;
> +
> + write_memory (addr - 3, buf, 5);
These code sequences are duplicated in lots of places.
Writing like this instead is both shorter and less error prone:
const gdb_byte buf[] = { 0x48, 0x33, 0xc0, 0x90, 0x90 };
write_memory (addr - 3, buf, sizeof (buf));
... and IMO eliminates the need to have the sequence duplicated in the
comment above.
Going further, we can make these sequences be globals, like:
/* The instruction sequences used in x86_64 machines for a
disabled is-enabled probe. */
const gdb_byte amd64_dtrace_disabled_probe_sequence_1[] = {
/* xor %rax, %rax */ 0x48, 0x33, 0xc0,
/* ADDR: nop */ 0x90,
/* nop */ 0x90
};
const gdb_byte amd64_dtrace_disabled_probe_sequence_2[] = {
/* xor %rax, %rax */ 0x48, 0x33, 0xc0,
/* ADDR: ret */ 0xc3,
/* nop */ 0x90
};
etc. And then instead of:
> +amd64_dtrace_probe_is_enabled (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, CORE_ADDR addr)
> +{
> + gdb_byte buf[5];
> + read_memory (addr - 3, buf, 5);
> +
> + /* The instruction sequence used in x86_64 machines for a disabled
> + is-enabled probe is:
> +
> + xor %rax, %rax => 48 33 C0
> + ADDR: nop => 90
> + nop => 90
> +
> + or
> +
> + xor %rax, %rax => 48 33 C0
> + ADDR: ret => c3
> + nop => 90
> +
> + This function returns 1 if the instructions at ADDR do _not_
> + follow any of these patterns.
> +
> + Note that ADDR is offset 3 bytes from the beginning of these
> + sequences. */
> +
> + return !((buf[0] == 0x48) && (buf[1] == 0x33) && (buf[2] == 0xc0) /* xor */
> + && ((buf[3] == 0x90) || (buf[3] == 0xc3)) /* nop | ret */
> + && (buf[4] == 0x90)); /* nop */
> +}
Simply write:
amd64_dtrace_probe_is_enabled (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, CORE_ADDR addr)
{
gdb_byte buf[5];
read_code (addr - 3, buf, 5);
return (memcmp (buf, amd64_dtrace_disabled_probe_sequence_1) != 0
&& memcmp (buf, amd64_dtrace_disabled_probe_sequence_2) != 0)
}
... etc.
Let the compiler worry about optimizing those memcmps if necessary.
> + static int arg_reg_map[6] =
write:
static const int arg_reg_map[] =
> + {
> + AMD64_RDI_REGNUM, /* Arg 1. */
> + AMD64_RSI_REGNUM, /* Arg 2. */
> + AMD64_RDX_REGNUM, /* Arg 3. */
> + AMD64_RCX_REGNUM, /* Arg 4. */
> + AMD64_R8_REGNUM, /* Arg 5. */
> + AMD64_R9_REGNUM /* Arg 6. */
> + };
+
+ /* DTrace probe arguments can be found on the ABI-defined places for
+ regular arguments at the current PC. The probe abstraction
+ currently supports up to 12 arguments for probes. */
+
+ if (narg < 6)
+ {
I'd suggest putting the arg_reg_map array within this if block.
Thanks,
Pedro Alves
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-16 22:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-10 17:18 [PATCH V2 0/9] Add support for DTrace USDT probes to gdb Jose E. Marchesi
2014-10-10 17:18 ` [PATCH V2 6/9] Support for DTrace USDT probes in x86_64 targets Jose E. Marchesi
2014-10-16 22:07 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2014-10-17 12:35 ` Jose E. Marchesi
2014-10-17 12:42 ` Pedro Alves
2014-10-17 12:47 ` Jose E. Marchesi
2014-10-17 12:53 ` Pedro Alves
2014-10-17 19:48 ` Jose E. Marchesi
2014-10-16 22:07 ` Pedro Alves
2014-10-16 22:17 ` Pedro Alves
2014-10-10 17:18 ` [PATCH V2 1/9] Adapt `info probes' to support printing probes of different types Jose E. Marchesi
2014-10-10 17:18 ` [PATCH V2 5/9] New probe type: DTrace USDT probes Jose E. Marchesi
2014-10-14 19:01 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2014-10-15 13:28 ` Jose E. Marchesi
2014-10-10 17:18 ` [PATCH V2 8/9] Documentation for " Jose E. Marchesi
2014-10-10 18:18 ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-10-10 17:18 ` [PATCH V2 2/9] Move `compute_probe_arg' and `compile_probe_arg' to probe.c Jose E. Marchesi
2014-10-10 17:18 ` [PATCH V2 4/9] New gdbarch functions: dtrace_parse_probe_argument, dtrace_probe_is_enabled, dtrace_enable_probe, dtrace_disable_probe Jose E. Marchesi
2014-10-10 17:18 ` [PATCH V2 3/9] New commands `enable probe' and `disable probe' Jose E. Marchesi
2014-10-10 18:15 ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-10-10 22:03 ` Doug Evans
2014-10-11 6:35 ` Jose E. Marchesi
2014-10-13 16:41 ` Doug Evans
2014-10-14 19:02 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2014-10-17 0:07 ` Doug Evans
2014-10-17 0:36 ` Pedro Alves
2014-10-17 0:43 ` Pedro Alves
2014-10-17 2:31 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2014-10-17 11:23 ` Pedro Alves
2014-10-17 0:55 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2014-10-17 5:52 ` Jose E. Marchesi
2014-10-11 17:04 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2014-10-14 18:53 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2014-10-15 13:28 ` Jose E. Marchesi
2014-10-10 17:18 ` [PATCH V2 7/9] Simple testsuite for DTrace USDT probes Jose E. Marchesi
2014-10-16 22:36 ` Pedro Alves
2014-10-17 12:01 ` Jose E. Marchesi
2014-10-17 12:18 ` Pedro Alves
2014-10-10 17:18 ` [PATCH V2 9/9] Announce the DTrace USDT probes support in NEWS Jose E. Marchesi
2014-10-10 18:16 ` Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=544041A7.50802@gmail.com \
--to=alves.ped@gmail.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=jose.marchesi@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox