From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
Cc: Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>, gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 3/3] Test on solib load and unload
Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2013 16:31:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a9ilm49b.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADPb22Sc-Rg5Juk_1-vH8f5nnrfRd_nVBZ_h8sT=xc0oGoo7Ug@mail.gmail.com> (Doug Evans's message of "Fri, 4 Oct 2013 17:34:50 -0700")
>>>>> "Doug" == Doug Evans <dje@google.com> writes:
Tom> In GDB_PARALLEL mode, "make clean" works by zapping a few
Tom> directories... much nicer :-). On my branch I removed all those
Tom> Makefiles too. I'm curious whether I ought to try to upstream this.
Doug> zapping directories is another way to go, I know it's been
Doug> discussed on and off for years. I hesitate to mention it because
Doug> I too am not sure whether upstream would accept it. It is nicer
Doug> ...
FWIW the reason I haven't prepped & submitted the patches for this is
that we decided that plain "runtest" would not use the same directory
layout as parallel mode. So, the Makefiles are still needed for cleanup
in this mode.
If nobody cares about that -- I certainly don't, I never use "make
clean" in the test suite -- then I'm happy to go ahead.
Tom
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-07 16:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-14 13:01 [RFC] GDB performance testing infrastructure Yao Qi
2013-08-21 20:39 ` Tom Tromey
2013-08-27 6:21 ` Yao Qi
2013-08-27 13:49 ` Agovic, Sanimir
2013-08-28 3:04 ` Yao Qi
2013-09-19 0:36 ` Doug Evans
2013-08-28 4:17 ` [RFC 0/3] GDB Performance testing Yao Qi
2013-08-28 4:17 ` [RFC 3/3] Test on solib load and unload Yao Qi
2013-08-28 4:27 ` Yao Qi
2013-08-28 11:31 ` Agovic, Sanimir
2013-09-03 1:59 ` Yao Qi
2013-09-03 6:33 ` Agovic, Sanimir
2013-09-02 15:24 ` Blanc, Nicolas
2013-09-03 2:04 ` Yao Qi
2013-09-03 7:50 ` Blanc, Nicolas
2013-09-19 22:45 ` Doug Evans
2013-09-20 19:19 ` Tom Tromey
2013-10-05 0:34 ` Doug Evans
2013-10-07 16:31 ` Tom Tromey [this message]
2013-09-22 6:25 ` Yao Qi
2013-09-23 0:14 ` Doug Evans
2013-09-24 2:31 ` Yao Qi
2013-10-05 0:37 ` Doug Evans
2013-09-20 19:14 ` Tom Tromey
2013-08-28 4:17 ` [RFC 1/3] New make target 'check-perf' and new dir gdb.perf Yao Qi
2013-08-28 9:40 ` Agovic, Sanimir
2013-09-19 17:47 ` Doug Evans
2013-09-20 19:00 ` Tom Tromey
2013-09-20 18:59 ` Tom Tromey
2013-08-28 4:17 ` [RFC 2/3] Perf test framework Yao Qi
2013-08-28 9:57 ` Agovic, Sanimir
2013-09-03 1:45 ` Yao Qi
2013-09-03 6:38 ` Agovic, Sanimir
2013-09-19 19:09 ` Doug Evans
2013-09-20 8:04 ` Yao Qi
2013-09-20 16:51 ` Doug Evans
2013-09-22 2:54 ` Yao Qi
2013-09-22 23:14 ` Doug Evans
2013-09-20 17:12 ` Doug Evans
2013-09-19 17:25 ` [RFC 0/3] GDB Performance testing Doug Evans
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87a9ilm49b.fsf@fleche.redhat.com \
--to=tromey@redhat.com \
--cc=dje@google.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=yao@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox