From: Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
To: "Blanc, Nicolas" <nicolas.blanc@intel.com>
Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 3/3] Test on solib load and unload
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2013 02:04:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52254353.1080907@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <388084C8C1E6A64FA36AD1D656E4856624357388@IRSMSX106.ger.corp.intel.com>
Hi, Nicolas,
On 09/02/2013 11:24 PM, Blanc, Nicolas wrote:
>> >+ for (i = 0; i < number; i++)
>> >+ dlclose (handles[i]);
> The loop above closes SOs in FIFO style, which might be optimal for GDB.
> You could alternate closing from the front and closing from the back.
That is a good idea. I'll rewrite the code, and see how much the
performance is impacted by the order.
>
> I found a bit odd that "make check-perf" is not recognized in the top gdb folder,
> as "make check" is. But again, it's a minor point to me.
Can you elaborate? "make check-perf" should be equivalent to "make
check", but running different sets of test cases.
--
Yao (é½å°§)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-03 2:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-14 13:01 [RFC] GDB performance testing infrastructure Yao Qi
2013-08-21 20:39 ` Tom Tromey
2013-08-27 6:21 ` Yao Qi
2013-08-27 13:49 ` Agovic, Sanimir
2013-08-28 3:04 ` Yao Qi
2013-09-19 0:36 ` Doug Evans
2013-08-28 4:17 ` [RFC 0/3] GDB Performance testing Yao Qi
2013-08-28 4:17 ` [RFC 1/3] New make target 'check-perf' and new dir gdb.perf Yao Qi
2013-08-28 9:40 ` Agovic, Sanimir
2013-09-19 17:47 ` Doug Evans
2013-09-20 19:00 ` Tom Tromey
2013-09-20 18:59 ` Tom Tromey
2013-08-28 4:17 ` [RFC 2/3] Perf test framework Yao Qi
2013-08-28 9:57 ` Agovic, Sanimir
2013-09-03 1:45 ` Yao Qi
2013-09-03 6:38 ` Agovic, Sanimir
2013-09-19 19:09 ` Doug Evans
2013-09-20 8:04 ` Yao Qi
2013-09-20 16:51 ` Doug Evans
2013-09-22 2:54 ` Yao Qi
2013-09-22 23:14 ` Doug Evans
2013-09-20 17:12 ` Doug Evans
2013-08-28 4:17 ` [RFC 3/3] Test on solib load and unload Yao Qi
2013-08-28 4:27 ` Yao Qi
2013-08-28 11:31 ` Agovic, Sanimir
2013-09-03 1:59 ` Yao Qi
2013-09-03 6:33 ` Agovic, Sanimir
2013-09-02 15:24 ` Blanc, Nicolas
2013-09-03 2:04 ` Yao Qi [this message]
2013-09-03 7:50 ` Blanc, Nicolas
2013-09-19 22:45 ` Doug Evans
2013-09-20 19:19 ` Tom Tromey
2013-10-05 0:34 ` Doug Evans
2013-10-07 16:31 ` Tom Tromey
2013-09-22 6:25 ` Yao Qi
2013-09-23 0:14 ` Doug Evans
2013-09-24 2:31 ` Yao Qi
2013-10-05 0:37 ` Doug Evans
2013-09-20 19:14 ` Tom Tromey
2013-09-19 17:25 ` [RFC 0/3] GDB Performance testing Doug Evans
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52254353.1080907@codesourcery.com \
--to=yao@codesourcery.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=nicolas.blanc@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox