From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, brobecker@adacore.com, yao@codesourcery.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Unbuffer stdout and stderr on windows
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 13:17:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <83y581n5ag.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <520E1109.7000304@redhat.com>
> Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 12:46:17 +0100
> From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
>
> IMO, stderr should _always_ be forced to unbuffered.
We are in agreement about stderr. The issue is with stdout.
> I can't really imagine that leaving stdout fully buffered to
> ever be good (which the cygwin detection seems to want to preserve),
> even for frontends, given GDB is an interactive program, and even
> MI is text/line based.
If the choice is between fully buffered stdout and unbuffered stdout,
I prefer the former for performance reasons.
> So I think the "in cygwin" detection is really not necessary
> or desirable, and this patch should go back to its original form:
>
> +#ifdef _WIN32
> + /* A Cygwin ssh session may not look like a terminal to the Windows
> + runtime; ensure unbuffered output. */
> + setvbuf (stdout, NULL, _IONBF, BUFSIZ);
> + setvbuf (stderr, NULL, _IONBF, BUFSIZ);
> +#endif
Sorry, I disagree. No one has ever complained about the current
buffering of stdout on Windows. The issue that is the subject of this
thread is a problem that happens in running the test suite. I firmly
believe in the principle of not fixing that which isn't broken.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-16 13:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-22 3:07 Yao Qi
2013-07-22 15:41 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-07-23 6:35 ` Yao Qi
2013-07-23 17:52 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-07-29 19:26 ` Christopher Faylor
2013-07-29 19:30 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-07-29 19:51 ` Pedro Alves
2013-07-31 3:40 ` Christopher Faylor
2013-08-12 21:11 ` Joel Brobecker
2013-08-13 17:28 ` Christopher Faylor
2013-08-13 18:08 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-08-14 0:05 ` Joel Brobecker
2013-08-15 17:36 ` Christopher Faylor
2013-08-15 17:44 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-08-15 17:59 ` Christopher Faylor
2013-08-15 18:44 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-08-16 11:46 ` Pedro Alves
2013-08-16 12:34 ` Yao Qi
2013-08-16 13:20 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-08-16 13:37 ` Pedro Alves
2013-08-16 14:03 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-08-16 14:21 ` Pedro Alves
2013-08-16 14:57 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-08-16 15:10 ` Pedro Alves
2013-08-16 15:24 ` Pedro Alves
2013-08-16 15:43 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-08-16 16:41 ` Christopher Faylor
2013-08-16 15:41 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-08-22 6:14 ` Yao Qi
2013-08-22 14:18 ` Joel Brobecker
2013-08-23 2:20 ` Yao Qi
2013-08-23 13:38 ` Joel Brobecker
2013-08-27 20:39 ` Pedro Alves
2013-08-28 7:23 ` Yao Qi
2013-08-28 9:39 ` Pedro Alves
2013-08-28 12:25 ` Yao Qi
2013-08-16 13:17 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2013-08-16 13:30 ` Pedro Alves
2013-08-16 13:42 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-08-16 14:13 ` Pedro Alves
2013-08-16 14:44 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-08-16 15:05 ` Pedro Alves
2013-08-16 15:13 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-07-29 19:30 ` Christopher Faylor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=83y581n5ag.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=yao@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox