From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, brobecker@adacore.com, yao@codesourcery.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Unbuffer stdout and stderr on windows
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 14:44:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <83pptdn194.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <520E339D.3020209@redhat.com>
> Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 15:13:49 +0100
> From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
> CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, brobecker@adacore.com, yao@codesourcery.com
>
> > Right now, the amount of such "broken"
> > outputs is usually very small, and the fact that GDB flushes its
> > stdout probably makes it negligibly small. If we cause more of these
> > instances to happen, the probability of a failure in a given session
> > will go up.
>
> Not sure what you mean by causing more instances to happen?
I mean by that having more smaller chunks of text come out of GDB's
end of the pipe.
> It seems to me the mixing is a direct consequence of buffering.
> With buffering of stdout and stderr, the runtime will push chunks
> of lines to both stdout and stderr when the internal buffers are full,
> with no regard to line endings. IOW, if gdb does:
>
> "line1\nline2\n" -> stdout
> "LINE3\nLINE4\n" -> stderr
>
> then depending on when is the internal stdout and stderr
> buffers filled, the runtime may well flush it like:
>
> "line1\nliNE3\nLINE4\nn", and then "e2\n"
Yes, but since we flush stdout, the above shouldn't happen.
> > Maybe we should dig deeper in the original problem as well, because I
> > still have only a very vague notion of why would GDB, which is a
> > single-threaded program, cause mixing when it flushes stdout
> > regularly. What am I missing?
>
> I think so too. A paste of the mixed output would be good
> to start.
Agreed.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-16 14:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-22 3:07 Yao Qi
2013-07-22 15:41 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-07-23 6:35 ` Yao Qi
2013-07-23 17:52 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-07-29 19:26 ` Christopher Faylor
2013-07-29 19:30 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-07-29 19:51 ` Pedro Alves
2013-07-31 3:40 ` Christopher Faylor
2013-08-12 21:11 ` Joel Brobecker
2013-08-13 17:28 ` Christopher Faylor
2013-08-13 18:08 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-08-14 0:05 ` Joel Brobecker
2013-08-15 17:36 ` Christopher Faylor
2013-08-15 17:44 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-08-15 17:59 ` Christopher Faylor
2013-08-15 18:44 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-08-16 11:46 ` Pedro Alves
2013-08-16 12:34 ` Yao Qi
2013-08-16 13:20 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-08-16 13:37 ` Pedro Alves
2013-08-16 14:03 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-08-16 14:21 ` Pedro Alves
2013-08-16 14:57 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-08-16 15:10 ` Pedro Alves
2013-08-16 15:24 ` Pedro Alves
2013-08-16 15:43 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-08-16 16:41 ` Christopher Faylor
2013-08-16 15:41 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-08-22 6:14 ` Yao Qi
2013-08-22 14:18 ` Joel Brobecker
2013-08-23 2:20 ` Yao Qi
2013-08-23 13:38 ` Joel Brobecker
2013-08-27 20:39 ` Pedro Alves
2013-08-28 7:23 ` Yao Qi
2013-08-28 9:39 ` Pedro Alves
2013-08-28 12:25 ` Yao Qi
2013-08-16 13:17 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-08-16 13:30 ` Pedro Alves
2013-08-16 13:42 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-08-16 14:13 ` Pedro Alves
2013-08-16 14:44 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2013-08-16 15:05 ` Pedro Alves
2013-08-16 15:13 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-07-29 19:30 ` Christopher Faylor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=83pptdn194.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=yao@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox