From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix "PC register is not available" issue
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 17:33:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5328835C.4010908@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <83k3bra0rx.fsf@gnu.org>
On 03/18/2014 05:12 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 09:54:13 -0700
>> From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
>> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
>>
>>>> Another thought I had on your patch is that we might want to limit
>>>> the warning to situation where the return code is not a permission
>>>> denied.
>>>
>>> I'm not sure we should bother. After all, if the problem is real, we
>>> will get an error further down the line, when we use the handle to
>>> that thread to do something with it.
>>>
>>> IOW, I see no need to thrash the entire session because of something
>>> that isn't fatal.
>>
>> I didn't mean to change the behavior - only hide the warning.
>
> Ah, OK. I think I'll do that in the next version of the patch.
>
>> I think the only part we need to look at before putting your patch
>> in is analyzing its side-effects.
>
> I'll look into that and post the results.
I see that the GetThreadContext call (do_windows_fetch_inferior_registers)
doesn't check for errors (I think it should (*)). It'd be interesting to know whether gdb can
actually read the registers off of this thread, and if so, what's the
thread's backtrace like.
(*) - note the other place that calls GetThreadContext does it under
a CHECK:
CHECK (GetThreadContext (th->h, &th->context));
--
Pedro Alves
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-18 17:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-17 19:43 Eli Zaretskii
2014-03-18 16:16 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-03-18 16:35 ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-03-18 16:54 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-03-18 17:13 ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-03-18 17:33 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2014-03-19 3:41 ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-03-19 10:07 ` Pedro Alves
2014-03-19 16:24 ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-03-19 16:41 ` Pedro Alves
2014-03-26 18:49 ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-03-27 12:56 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-03-27 17:41 ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-03-28 13:00 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-03-28 17:29 ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-03-28 14:50 ` Pedro Alves
2014-03-28 17:35 ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-03-28 17:49 ` Pedro Alves
2014-03-28 18:30 ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-03-31 15:31 ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-04-05 9:06 ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-04-07 16:58 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-04-07 17:09 ` Pedro Alves
2014-04-07 18:25 ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-04-07 21:39 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-04-08 2:44 ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-04-08 4:23 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-04-08 15:17 ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-04-08 11:32 ` Pedro Alves
2014-04-08 16:43 ` Pedro Alves
2014-04-08 17:10 ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-04-08 17:36 ` Pedro Alves
2014-04-08 17:54 ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-04-11 20:06 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-04-19 8:33 ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-04-21 15:43 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-04-21 15:59 ` Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5328835C.4010908@redhat.com \
--to=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox