From: Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>, <tromey@redhat.com>,
<gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PR gdb/15871: Unavailable entry value is not shown correctly
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 01:25:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52156841.8030105@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5214DD85.5060605@redhat.com>
On 08/21/2013 11:32 PM, Pedro Alves wrote:
> I looked
> around a bit over memory_error calls, and the need to handle random
> errno values, other than the EIOs gdb itself hardcodes, probably comes
> (only) from deprecated_xfer_memory, which uses errno for error
Is it in function default_xfer_partial?
> indication, but I didn't look exhaustively. We should really get rid
> of that...)
>
What do you mean by "that"? using errno for error indication?
> +/* Report a target xfer memory error by throwing a suitable
> + exception. */
> +
> +static void
> +target_xfer_memory_error (enum target_xfer_error err, CORE_ADDR memaddr)
> +{
> + switch (err)
> + {
> + case TARGET_XFER_E_IO:
> + /* Actually, address between memaddr and memaddr + len was out of
> + bounds. */
This line of comment doesn't make much sense in the context of this
function.
This patch looks good to me. Please commit it without the change to
gdb.trace/entry-values.exp, and I'll update my patch to remove kfail.
A suggestion here, IWBN to print the string of 'enum target_xfer_error'
in the debugging message at the end of target_xfer_partial. We are
print numbers currently.
--
Yao (é½å°§)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-22 1:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-13 7:41 [PATCH 0/2] Test case on entry values Yao Qi
2013-08-13 7:41 ` [PATCH 1/2] Test case for " Yao Qi
2013-08-20 17:39 ` Tom Tromey
2013-08-21 5:55 ` Yao Qi
2013-08-21 15:02 ` Tom Tromey
2013-08-22 0:12 ` Yao Qi
2013-08-22 14:05 ` Tom Tromey
2013-08-23 0:27 ` Yao Qi
2013-08-23 19:23 ` Tom Tromey
2013-08-24 1:56 ` Yao Qi
2013-08-30 14:52 ` Vidya Praveen
2013-08-30 15:29 ` Vidya Praveen
2013-08-31 0:22 ` Yao Qi
2013-09-10 15:30 ` Vidya Praveen
2013-09-10 23:44 ` Yao Qi
2013-09-11 13:27 ` Vidya Praveen
2013-08-13 7:41 ` [RFC 2/2] Test entry values in trace frame Yao Qi
2013-08-20 17:48 ` Tom Tromey
2013-08-21 6:06 ` Yao Qi
2013-08-21 14:35 ` [PATCH] PR gdb/15871: Unavailable entry value is not shown correctly Pedro Alves
2013-08-21 14:47 ` Mark Kettenis
2013-08-21 15:32 ` Pedro Alves
2013-08-21 15:43 ` Mark Kettenis
2013-08-22 1:25 ` Yao Qi [this message]
2013-08-22 10:04 ` [COMMIT] " Pedro Alves
2013-08-23 1:08 ` Yao Qi
2013-08-23 16:50 ` Pedro Alves
2013-08-23 0:32 ` [RFC 2/2] Test entry values in trace frame Yao Qi
2013-08-23 17:04 ` Pedro Alves
2013-08-23 19:16 ` Tom Tromey
2013-08-24 1:56 ` Yao Qi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52156841.8030105@codesourcery.com \
--to=yao@codesourcery.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
--cc=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=tromey@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox