From: Vidya Praveen <vidyapraveen@arm.com>
To: Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Test case for entry values.
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 15:29:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130830152927.GC9666@e103625-lin.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5220B1B6.2000304@arm.com>
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 03:52:38PM +0100, Vidya Praveen wrote:
> Hi Yao Qi,
>
> On 08/13/13 08:39, Yao Qi wrote:
> [...]
> > +set bar_length ""
> > +set bar_call_foo ""
> > +
> > +# Calculate the offset of the last instruction from the beginning.
> > +set test "disassemble bar"
> > +gdb_test_multiple $test $test {
> > + -re ".*$hex <\\+$decimal>:\[ \t\]+call\[^\r\n\]+\r\n\[ \]+$hex <\\+($decimal)>:" {
>
> If I understand it right, this expects a 'call' instruction. Isn't this target
> specific?
Sorry I missed this comment:
+if [string equal $bar_call_foo ""] {
+ fail "Find the call or branch instruction offset in bar"
+ # The following test makes no sense if the offset is unknown. We need
+ # to update the pattern above to match call or branch instruction for
+ # the target architecture.
+ return -1
+}
This test fails for ARM targets as they generate 'bl'.
Regards
VP
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-30 15:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-13 7:41 [PATCH 0/2] Test case on " Yao Qi
2013-08-13 7:41 ` [RFC 2/2] Test entry values in trace frame Yao Qi
2013-08-20 17:48 ` Tom Tromey
2013-08-21 6:06 ` Yao Qi
2013-08-21 14:35 ` [PATCH] PR gdb/15871: Unavailable entry value is not shown correctly Pedro Alves
2013-08-21 14:47 ` Mark Kettenis
2013-08-21 15:32 ` Pedro Alves
2013-08-21 15:43 ` Mark Kettenis
2013-08-22 1:25 ` Yao Qi
2013-08-22 10:04 ` [COMMIT] " Pedro Alves
2013-08-23 1:08 ` Yao Qi
2013-08-23 16:50 ` Pedro Alves
2013-08-23 0:32 ` [RFC 2/2] Test entry values in trace frame Yao Qi
2013-08-23 17:04 ` Pedro Alves
2013-08-23 19:16 ` Tom Tromey
2013-08-24 1:56 ` Yao Qi
2013-08-13 7:41 ` [PATCH 1/2] Test case for entry values Yao Qi
2013-08-20 17:39 ` Tom Tromey
2013-08-21 5:55 ` Yao Qi
2013-08-21 15:02 ` Tom Tromey
2013-08-22 0:12 ` Yao Qi
2013-08-22 14:05 ` Tom Tromey
2013-08-23 0:27 ` Yao Qi
2013-08-23 19:23 ` Tom Tromey
2013-08-24 1:56 ` Yao Qi
2013-08-30 14:52 ` Vidya Praveen
2013-08-30 15:29 ` Vidya Praveen [this message]
2013-08-31 0:22 ` Yao Qi
2013-09-10 15:30 ` Vidya Praveen
2013-09-10 23:44 ` Yao Qi
2013-09-11 13:27 ` Vidya Praveen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130830152927.GC9666@e103625-lin.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=vidyapraveen@arm.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=yao@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox