From: Yufeng Zhang <Yufeng.Zhang@arm.com>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] add skip_shlib_tests guard to tests that require shared lib support
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 09:14:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <508119E2.8040209@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <507ECC26.3060400@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 872 bytes --]
On 10/17/12 16:17, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On 10/12/2012 09:57 AM, Yufeng Zhang wrote:
>>
>> +if {[skip_shlib_tests]} {
>> + untested ctxobj.exp
>> + return -1
>> +}
>
> See<http://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/GDBTestcaseCookbook>.
>
> "In untested calls, please spell out the reason the test ends up untested, instead
> of just writing the test name, as with the latter we just end up with the test name
> duplicated in the gdb.sum output. For example: "
>
> But in these skip_ *cases, I think we can just be silent. The vast majority of
> the skip_* calls in the testsuite agrees (e.g., seen
> with 'grep -rn "skip_" -A 3 | grep untested').
>
> IOW, this is OK with the untested calls removed.
Thanks!
I've removed the untested calls; the updated patch has been committed
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2012-10/msg00077.html.
Thanks,
Yufeng
[-- Attachment #2: skip-shared-lib-tests.patch.v2 --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1498 bytes --]
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/ctxobj.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/ctxobj.exp
index b41ed38..a0eceb7 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/ctxobj.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/ctxobj.exp
@@ -13,6 +13,10 @@
# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
# along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. */
+if {[skip_shlib_tests]} {
+ return -1
+}
+
set executable ctxobj-m
# The sources used to build two shared libraries (SO). We use the exact
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/print-file-var.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/print-file-var.exp
index 994abc4..03a2832 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/print-file-var.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/print-file-var.exp
@@ -13,6 +13,10 @@
# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
# along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. */
+if {[skip_shlib_tests]} {
+ return -1
+}
+
set executable print-file-var-main
set lib1 "print-file-var-lib1"
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/type-opaque.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/type-opaque.exp
index f91c24b..ffd4662 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/type-opaque.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/type-opaque.exp
@@ -15,6 +15,10 @@
# Test resolving of an opaque type from the loaded shared library.
+if {[skip_shlib_tests]} {
+ return -1
+}
+
set testfile type-opaque-main
set libfile type-opaque-lib
set srcfile ${testfile}.c
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-19 9:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-12 8:57 Yufeng Zhang
2012-10-17 8:19 ` Yufeng Zhang
2012-10-17 15:18 ` Pedro Alves
2012-10-19 9:14 ` Yufeng Zhang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=508119E2.8040209@arm.com \
--to=yufeng.zhang@arm.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=palves@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox