On 10/17/12 16:17, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On 10/12/2012 09:57 AM, Yufeng Zhang wrote:
>>
>> +if {[skip_shlib_tests]} {
>> +    untested ctxobj.exp
>> +    return -1
>> +}
>
> See<http://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/GDBTestcaseCookbook>.
>
> "In untested calls, please spell out the reason the test ends up untested, instead
> of just writing the test name, as with the latter we just end up with the test name
> duplicated in the gdb.sum output. For example: "
>
> But in these skip_ *cases, I think we can just be silent.  The vast majority of
> the skip_* calls in the testsuite agrees (e.g., seen
> with 'grep -rn "skip_" -A 3 | grep untested').
>
> IOW, this is OK with the untested calls removed.

Thanks!

I've removed the untested calls; the updated patch has been committed
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2012-10/msg00077.html.

Thanks,
Yufeng