Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: Michael Eager <eager@eagerm.com>
Cc: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@codesourcery.com>,
	       "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: MIPS Linux signals
Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 18:31:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FBBDB61.7070002@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FBBD770.6080900@eagerm.com>

On 05/22/2012 07:14 PM, Michael Eager wrote:

> On 05/22/2012 09:01 AM, Pedro Alves wrote:
> 
>>>> target_signal_from_host =>   gdb_signal_from_host (or gdb_signal_from_host_signal)
>>>> target_signal_to_host =>   gdb_signal_to_host (or gdb_signal_to_host_signal)
>>>>
>>>> gdbarch_target_signal_from_host =>   gdbarch_gdb_signal_from_target (or gdbarch_gdb_signal_from_target_signal)
>>>> gdbarch_target_signal_to_host =>   gdbarch_gdb_signal_to_target (or gdbarch_gdb_signal_to_target_signal)
>>>
>>> OK, but I'd recommend
>>>    target_signal_from_host =>   gdb_signal_from_target
>>>    target_signal_to_host =>   gdb_signal_to_target
>>>
>>> This is symmetric with the gdbarch_ functions and clear that the function
>>> translates to/from target system values, not the host system.
>>
>>


>> But it's not what the functions do...  They really convert from the host
>> system signals, not the target's.  I think the symmetry will only lead to
>> people getting confused (which one to call in common/target-independent code?).
> 
> If you are running GDB on a Windows host, for example, what host
> system signals are you translating?


There's only be one such call -- the one from within corelow.c, if there's no
gdbarch_target_signal_from_host callback installed.  (The Windows ports don't call
target_signal_from_host anywhere (windows-nat.c and friends).  And in that case, if
you e.g., load a cygwin core, the target_signal_from_host fallback will try to
convert the signal number as if it was a host signal number.  If you're running g
b on a cygwin host, you'll happen to get the right values.  If you're debugging
a core (that same core or of some other non-native arch) with a cross debugger, with
a mingw hosted gdb, then target_signal_from_host will _still_ translate the signal
numbers found in mingw's signal.h header.  For reference, those are:

#define SIGINT          2       /* Interactive attention */
#define SIGILL          4       /* Illegal instruction */
#define SIGFPE          8       /* Floating point error */
#define SIGSEGV         11      /* Segmentation violation */
#define SIGTERM         15      /* Termination request */
#define SIGBREAK        21      /* Control-break */
#define SIGABRT         22      /* Abnormal termination (abort) */

All other signal numbers you pass to target_signal_from_host will end up
as TARGET_SIGNAL_UNKNOWN, due to the bunch of #ifdef SIGFOO bits in
common/signals.  Obviously, in most cases, this translation will
be wrong.  But the point to be taken is, target_signal_from_host _always_
translates the signal number passed as argument as if it was a host
signal number, no matter what the target really is.

-- 
Pedro Alves


  reply	other threads:[~2012-05-22 18:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-20  2:03 Michael Eager
2012-05-21 11:04 ` Pedro Alves
2012-05-21 14:51   ` Michael Eager
2012-05-21 17:37     ` Pedro Alves
2012-05-21 18:06       ` Michael Eager
2012-05-21 18:19 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
     [not found] ` <alpine.DEB.1.10.1205211232260.11227@tp.orcam.me.uk>
2012-05-21 18:21   ` Michael Eager
2012-05-21 22:34     ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2012-05-22  9:38       ` Pedro Alves
2012-05-21 21:35 ` Pedro Alves
2012-05-21 21:53   ` Michael Eager
2012-05-21 22:48     ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2012-05-22  0:16       ` Michael Eager
2012-05-22 10:17       ` Pedro Alves
2012-05-22 13:16         ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2012-05-22 13:32           ` Pedro Alves
2012-05-22 15:10         ` Move store_waitstatus to inf-child.c (was: Re: MIPS Linux signals) Pedro Alves
2012-05-22 15:40         ` MIPS Linux signals Michael Eager
2012-05-22 16:02           ` Pedro Alves
2012-05-22 18:14             ` Michael Eager
2012-05-22 18:31               ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2012-05-22 19:32                 ` Michael Eager
2012-05-22 22:06                   ` Pedro Alves
2012-05-22 16:26         ` Pedro Alves
2012-05-22 10:58       ` Pedro Alves
2012-05-22 19:31         ` Aleksandar Ristovski
2012-05-22 21:55           ` Pedro Alves
2012-05-22 23:29             ` Aleksandar Ristovski
2012-05-23 11:39               ` Pedro Alves

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FBBDB61.7070002@redhat.com \
    --to=palves@redhat.com \
    --cc=eager@eagerm.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=macro@codesourcery.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox