From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: Michael Eager <eager@eagerm.com>
Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: MIPS Linux signals
Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 11:04:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FBA2111.8010801@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FB850CA.7090701@eagerm.com>
On 05/20/2012 03:02 AM, Michael Eager wrote:
> Which leads me to some questions:
> 2 -- Is there any reason to implement EXE_BAD_* translations?
No.
> 3 -- Is the REALTIME_LO/HI translation obsolete cruft?
ChangeLog-2006 points at:
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2006-11/msg00340.html
where we see that REALTIME_LO/HI were defined in target headers,
while they should really be native/host defines. So it's not that they
got deprecated, but a target/host confusion bug was fixed. The
macros are still there in common/signals.c.
> 4 -- Do the multiple layers of wrappers around target_
> signal_{to,from}_host in signals.c serve any purpose?
Can you be more specific? What multiple layers?
--
Pedro Alves
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-21 11:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-20 2:03 Michael Eager
2012-05-21 11:04 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2012-05-21 14:51 ` Michael Eager
2012-05-21 17:37 ` Pedro Alves
2012-05-21 18:06 ` Michael Eager
2012-05-21 18:19 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.1.10.1205211232260.11227@tp.orcam.me.uk>
2012-05-21 18:21 ` Michael Eager
2012-05-21 22:34 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2012-05-22 9:38 ` Pedro Alves
2012-05-21 21:35 ` Pedro Alves
2012-05-21 21:53 ` Michael Eager
2012-05-21 22:48 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2012-05-22 0:16 ` Michael Eager
2012-05-22 10:17 ` Pedro Alves
2012-05-22 13:16 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2012-05-22 13:32 ` Pedro Alves
2012-05-22 15:10 ` Move store_waitstatus to inf-child.c (was: Re: MIPS Linux signals) Pedro Alves
2012-05-22 15:40 ` MIPS Linux signals Michael Eager
2012-05-22 16:02 ` Pedro Alves
2012-05-22 18:14 ` Michael Eager
2012-05-22 18:31 ` Pedro Alves
2012-05-22 19:32 ` Michael Eager
2012-05-22 22:06 ` Pedro Alves
2012-05-22 16:26 ` Pedro Alves
2012-05-22 10:58 ` Pedro Alves
2012-05-22 19:31 ` Aleksandar Ristovski
2012-05-22 21:55 ` Pedro Alves
2012-05-22 23:29 ` Aleksandar Ristovski
2012-05-23 11:39 ` Pedro Alves
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FBA2111.8010801@redhat.com \
--to=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=eager@eagerm.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox