From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com>
To: Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
Cc: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>,
"gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [RFA] let record_resume fail immediately on error
Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2009 16:57:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AA68C92.7070905@vmware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <daef60380909080052o2d0b6213o8db9f76f2e34504d@mail.gmail.com>
Hui Zhu wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 15:25, Hui Zhu<teawater@gmail.com> wrote:
>> If GDB call error in record_resume, user cannot keep debug the inferior.
>>
>> Hui
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 15:23, Hui Zhu<teawater@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> The "record_resume_error" in gdb-cvs is to make user after get a error
>>> of record_message, they can "record stop" close the record and keep
>>> debug the inferior.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Hui
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 14:58, Joel Brobecker<brobecker@adacore.com> wrote:
>>>>> if (!RECORD_IS_REPLAY)
>>>>> {
>>>>> if (do_record_message (get_current_regcache ()))
>>>>> - {
>>>>> - record_resume_error = 0;
>>>>> - }
>>>>> - else
>>>>> - {
>>>>> - record_resume_error = 1;
>>>>> - return;
>>>>> - }
>>>>> + internal_error (__FILE__, __LINE__,
>>>>> + _("record_resume: do_record_message failed."));
>>>>> +
>>>> Forgive me if I'm wrong, as I don't know the record.c code at all, but
>>>> I cannot help but think that the internal_error is suspicious here.
>>>> Why is this an internal_error?
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Joel
>>>>
>
> Hi guys,
>
> I make a patch that make "record_resume_error" work better. I did
> some test. It seems better than before.
Could you explain what you mean by better?
I mean, what behavior are you looking for here?
Here is the behavior that I see --- I am making a recording,
I say "continue", and after a while this "record_resume_error"
is triggered, and gdb stops and says "No more reverse-execution history."
I would never expect to see that message during recording.
> 2009-09-08 Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
>
> * record.c (record_wait): Change TARGET_SIGNAL_ABRT to
> TARGET_SIGNAL_0.
> ---
> record.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> --- a/record.c
> +++ b/record.c
> @@ -590,7 +590,7 @@ record_wait (struct target_ops *ops,
> {
> /* If record_resume get error, return directly. */
> status->kind = TARGET_WAITKIND_STOPPED;
> - status->value.sig = TARGET_SIGNAL_ABRT;
> + status->value.sig = TARGET_SIGNAL_0;
> return inferior_ptid;
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-08 16:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-08 4:03 Michael Snyder
2009-09-08 5:00 ` Hui Zhu
2009-09-08 6:59 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-08 7:23 ` Hui Zhu
2009-09-08 7:25 ` Hui Zhu
2009-09-08 7:53 ` Hui Zhu
2009-09-08 16:57 ` Michael Snyder [this message]
2009-09-09 2:05 ` Hui Zhu
2009-09-12 2:40 ` Hui Zhu
2009-09-24 3:10 ` Hui Zhu
2009-09-26 18:35 ` Michael Snyder
2009-09-27 2:51 ` Hui Zhu
2009-09-28 9:27 ` Hui Zhu
2009-09-28 18:12 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-29 2:33 ` Hui Zhu
2009-09-29 21:29 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-29 23:57 ` Hui Zhu
2009-10-14 2:10 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-10-14 2:28 ` Hui Zhu
2009-10-14 2:42 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-10-15 4:38 ` Hui Zhu
2009-10-15 4:58 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-10-15 7:17 ` Hui Zhu
2009-10-15 16:23 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-10-15 17:18 ` Michael Snyder
2009-10-16 3:37 ` Hui Zhu
2009-10-20 3:17 ` Hui Zhu
2009-10-23 7:29 ` Hui Zhu
2009-11-03 2:17 ` Hui Zhu
2009-11-03 18:57 ` Michael Snyder
2009-11-04 5:15 ` Hui Zhu
2009-11-10 7:02 ` Hui Zhu
2009-11-10 22:05 ` Tom Tromey
2009-11-11 0:55 ` Hui Zhu
2009-11-24 6:16 ` Hui Zhu
2009-11-24 17:14 ` Tom Tromey
2009-11-25 2:00 ` Hui Zhu
2009-11-25 16:25 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-11-25 17:59 ` Tom Tromey
2009-11-26 6:40 ` Hui Zhu
2009-11-28 0:29 ` Hui Zhu
2009-12-01 22:27 ` Tom Tromey
2009-12-02 3:23 ` Hui Zhu
2009-12-07 15:01 ` Hui Zhu
2009-12-12 8:41 ` Hui Zhu
2009-12-21 20:45 ` Tom Tromey
2009-12-22 3:18 ` Hui Zhu
2009-09-08 16:54 ` Michael Snyder
2009-09-08 16:52 ` Michael Snyder
2009-09-08 16:50 ` Michael Snyder
2009-09-08 17:05 ` Joel Brobecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AA68C92.7070905@vmware.com \
--to=msnyder@vmware.com \
--cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=teawater@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox