From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com>
To: Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
Cc: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>,
"gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [RFA] let record_resume fail immediately on error
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2009 18:57:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AF07CF2.1050902@vmware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <daef60380911021817g4ff471echd087ef05e9f94c19@mail.gmail.com>
Hui Zhu wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> Now we have a lot of patch in running.
> Could you please help me review this patch first?
OK, could you help me understand it?
You have an error-handler routine called do_record_message,
which calls record_message by way of catch_errors. You call
do_record_message from two places, record_wait and record_resume.
But now you want to bypass the error-handler routine when
you call record_message from record_resume, but keep it in
place for record_wait. Now you have two different ways of
calling record_message. Seems inconsistant. No explanation,
no comments explaining the difference.
> 2009-11-03 Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
>
> * record.c (record_resume_error): Deleted.
> (record_resume): Call record_message.
> (record_wait): Deleted record_resume_error.
> Set status when do_record_message need stop the inferior.
>
> ---
> record.c | 29 ++++++++++-------------------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/record.c
> +++ b/record.c
> @@ -954,7 +954,6 @@ record_close (int quitting)
> }
>
> static int record_resume_step = 0;
> -static int record_resume_error;
>
> /* "to_resume" target method. Resume the process record target. */
>
> @@ -966,15 +965,11 @@ record_resume (struct target_ops *ops, p
>
> if (!RECORD_IS_REPLAY)
> {
> - if (do_record_message (get_current_regcache (), signal))
> - {
> - record_resume_error = 0;
> - }
> - else
> - {
> - record_resume_error = 1;
> - return;
> - }
> + struct record_message_args args;
> +
> + args.regcache = get_current_regcache ();
> + args.signal = signal;
> + record_message (&args);
> record_beneath_to_resume (record_beneath_to_resume_ops, ptid, 1,
> signal);
> }
> @@ -1038,14 +1033,6 @@ record_wait (struct target_ops *ops,
>
> if (!RECORD_IS_REPLAY && ops != &record_core_ops)
> {
> - if (record_resume_error)
> - {
> - /* If record_resume get error, return directly. */
> - status->kind = TARGET_WAITKIND_STOPPED;
> - status->value.sig = TARGET_SIGNAL_ABRT;
> - return inferior_ptid;
> - }
> -
> if (record_resume_step)
> {
> /* This is a single step. */
> @@ -1091,7 +1078,11 @@ record_wait (struct target_ops *ops,
> Therefore we will not return to gdb.
> Record the insn and resume. */
> if (!do_record_message (regcache, TARGET_SIGNAL_0))
> - break;
> + {
> + status->kind = TARGET_WAITKIND_STOPPED;
> + status->value.sig = TARGET_SIGNAL_0;
> + break;
> + }
>
> record_beneath_to_resume (record_beneath_to_resume_ops,
> ptid, 1,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-03 18:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-08 4:03 Michael Snyder
2009-09-08 5:00 ` Hui Zhu
2009-09-08 6:59 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-08 7:23 ` Hui Zhu
2009-09-08 7:25 ` Hui Zhu
2009-09-08 7:53 ` Hui Zhu
2009-09-08 16:57 ` Michael Snyder
2009-09-09 2:05 ` Hui Zhu
2009-09-12 2:40 ` Hui Zhu
2009-09-24 3:10 ` Hui Zhu
2009-09-26 18:35 ` Michael Snyder
2009-09-27 2:51 ` Hui Zhu
2009-09-28 9:27 ` Hui Zhu
2009-09-28 18:12 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-29 2:33 ` Hui Zhu
2009-09-29 21:29 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-29 23:57 ` Hui Zhu
2009-10-14 2:10 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-10-14 2:28 ` Hui Zhu
2009-10-14 2:42 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-10-15 4:38 ` Hui Zhu
2009-10-15 4:58 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-10-15 7:17 ` Hui Zhu
2009-10-15 16:23 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-10-15 17:18 ` Michael Snyder
2009-10-16 3:37 ` Hui Zhu
2009-10-20 3:17 ` Hui Zhu
2009-10-23 7:29 ` Hui Zhu
2009-11-03 2:17 ` Hui Zhu
2009-11-03 18:57 ` Michael Snyder [this message]
2009-11-04 5:15 ` Hui Zhu
2009-11-10 7:02 ` Hui Zhu
2009-11-10 22:05 ` Tom Tromey
2009-11-11 0:55 ` Hui Zhu
2009-11-24 6:16 ` Hui Zhu
2009-11-24 17:14 ` Tom Tromey
2009-11-25 2:00 ` Hui Zhu
2009-11-25 16:25 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-11-25 17:59 ` Tom Tromey
2009-11-26 6:40 ` Hui Zhu
2009-11-28 0:29 ` Hui Zhu
2009-12-01 22:27 ` Tom Tromey
2009-12-02 3:23 ` Hui Zhu
2009-12-07 15:01 ` Hui Zhu
2009-12-12 8:41 ` Hui Zhu
2009-12-21 20:45 ` Tom Tromey
2009-12-22 3:18 ` Hui Zhu
2009-09-08 16:54 ` Michael Snyder
2009-09-08 16:52 ` Michael Snyder
2009-09-08 16:50 ` Michael Snyder
2009-09-08 17:05 ` Joel Brobecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AF07CF2.1050902@vmware.com \
--to=msnyder@vmware.com \
--cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=teawater@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox