Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com>
To: Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
Cc: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>,
	  "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [RFA] let record_resume fail immediately on error
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 18:35:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ABE5E8D.8080209@vmware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <daef60380909232010k629f62e9s37bb349302b37d59@mail.gmail.com>

Personally, I think this one isn't critical for 7.0.
Waiting for 7.1 will allow us more time to assess it.

Hui Zhu wrote:
> Hi Joel,
> 
> Sorry to disturb you.  Ping
> http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2009-09/msg00231.html
> 
> Thanks,
> Hui
> 
> On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 10:05, Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 00:55, Michael Snyder<msnyder@vmware.com> wrote:
>>> Hui Zhu wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 15:25, Hui Zhu<teawater@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> If GDB call error in record_resume, user cannot keep debug the inferior.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hui
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 15:23, Hui Zhu<teawater@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> The "record_resume_error" in gdb-cvs is to make user after get a error
>>>>>> of record_message, they can "record stop" close the record and keep
>>>>>> debug the inferior.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Hui
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 14:58, Joel Brobecker<brobecker@adacore.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>   if (!RECORD_IS_REPLAY)
>>>>>>>>     {
>>>>>>>>       if (do_record_message (get_current_regcache ()))
>>>>>>>> -        {
>>>>>>>> -          record_resume_error = 0;
>>>>>>>> -        }
>>>>>>>> -      else
>>>>>>>> -        {
>>>>>>>> -          record_resume_error = 1;
>>>>>>>> -          return;
>>>>>>>> -        }
>>>>>>>> +     internal_error (__FILE__, __LINE__,
>>>>>>>> +                     _("record_resume: do_record_message failed."));
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> Forgive me if I'm wrong, as I don't know the record.c code at all, but
>>>>>>> I cannot help but think that the internal_error is suspicious here.
>>>>>>> Why is this an internal_error?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Joel
>>>>>>>
>>>> Hi guys,
>>>>
>>>> I make a patch that make "record_resume_error" work better.  I did
>>>> some test.  It seems better than before.
>>> Could you explain what you mean by better?
>>> I mean, what behavior are you looking for here?
>>>
>>> Here is the behavior that I see --- I am making a recording,
>>> I say "continue", and after a while this "record_resume_error"
>>> is triggered, and gdb stops and says "No more reverse-execution history."
>>>
>>> I would never expect to see that message during recording.
>> In before, GDB cannot throw error in record_resume (It just in my
>> memory, maybe I am wrong).
>> If we try to do it, it will get:
>> (gdb) c
>> Continuing.
>> Cannot execute this command while the selected thread is running.
>> So I add record_resume_error to let record_wait to handle it.
>>
>> But record_wait cannot call error too.  So I let it:
>>          /* If record_resume get error, return directly.  */
>>          status->kind = TARGET_WAITKIND_STOPPED;
>>          status->value.sig = TARGET_SIGNAL_0;
>>          return inferior_ptid;
>>
>> But I found that record_resume can call error now.  So I make a new
>> patch for it.
>>
>> Could you help me try it?
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Hui
>>
>> 2009-09-09  Hui Zhu  <teawater@gmail.com>
>>
>>        * record.c (record_resume_error): Deleted.
>>        (record_resume): Call record_message.
>>        (record_wait): Deleted record_resume_error.
>>
>> ---
>>  record.c |   19 +------------------
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 18 deletions(-)
>>
>> --- a/record.c
>> +++ b/record.c
>> @@ -516,7 +516,6 @@ record_close (int quitting)
>>  }
>>
>>  static int record_resume_step = 0;
>> -static int record_resume_error;
>>
>>  static void
>>  record_resume (struct target_ops *ops, ptid_t ptid, int step,
>> @@ -526,15 +525,7 @@ record_resume (struct target_ops *ops, p
>>
>>   if (!RECORD_IS_REPLAY)
>>     {
>> -      if (do_record_message (get_current_regcache ()))
>> -        {
>> -          record_resume_error = 0;
>> -        }
>> -      else
>> -        {
>> -          record_resume_error = 1;
>> -          return;
>> -        }
>> +      record_message (get_current_regcache ());
>>       record_beneath_to_resume (record_beneath_to_resume_ops, ptid, 1,
>>                                 siggnal);
>>     }
>> @@ -586,14 +577,6 @@ record_wait (struct target_ops *ops,
>>
>>   if (!RECORD_IS_REPLAY)
>>     {
>> -      if (record_resume_error)
>> -       {
>> -         /* If record_resume get error, return directly.  */
>> -         status->kind = TARGET_WAITKIND_STOPPED;
>> -         status->value.sig = TARGET_SIGNAL_ABRT;
>> -         return inferior_ptid;
>> -       }
>> -
>>       if (record_resume_step)
>>        {
>>          /* This is a single step.  */
>>


  reply	other threads:[~2009-09-26 18:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-09-08  4:03 Michael Snyder
2009-09-08  5:00 ` Hui Zhu
2009-09-08  6:59 ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-08  7:23   ` Hui Zhu
2009-09-08  7:25     ` Hui Zhu
2009-09-08  7:53       ` Hui Zhu
2009-09-08 16:57         ` Michael Snyder
2009-09-09  2:05           ` Hui Zhu
2009-09-12  2:40             ` Hui Zhu
2009-09-24  3:10             ` Hui Zhu
2009-09-26 18:35               ` Michael Snyder [this message]
2009-09-27  2:51                 ` Hui Zhu
2009-09-28  9:27                 ` Hui Zhu
2009-09-28 18:12                   ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-29  2:33                     ` Hui Zhu
2009-09-29 21:29                       ` Joel Brobecker
2009-09-29 23:57                         ` Hui Zhu
2009-10-14  2:10                           ` Joel Brobecker
2009-10-14  2:28                             ` Hui Zhu
2009-10-14  2:42                               ` Joel Brobecker
2009-10-15  4:38                                 ` Hui Zhu
2009-10-15  4:58                                   ` Joel Brobecker
2009-10-15  7:17                                     ` Hui Zhu
2009-10-15 16:23                                       ` Joel Brobecker
2009-10-15 17:18                                         ` Michael Snyder
2009-10-16  3:37                                           ` Hui Zhu
2009-10-20  3:17                                             ` Hui Zhu
2009-10-23  7:29                                               ` Hui Zhu
2009-11-03  2:17                                                 ` Hui Zhu
2009-11-03 18:57                                                   ` Michael Snyder
2009-11-04  5:15                                                     ` Hui Zhu
2009-11-10  7:02                                                       ` Hui Zhu
2009-11-10 22:05                                                         ` Tom Tromey
2009-11-11  0:55                                                           ` Hui Zhu
2009-11-24  6:16                                                             ` Hui Zhu
2009-11-24 17:14                                                               ` Tom Tromey
2009-11-25  2:00                                                                 ` Hui Zhu
2009-11-25 16:25                                                                   ` Joel Brobecker
2009-11-25 17:59                                                                     ` Tom Tromey
2009-11-26  6:40                                                                       ` Hui Zhu
2009-11-28  0:29                                                                         ` Hui Zhu
2009-12-01 22:27                                                                         ` Tom Tromey
2009-12-02  3:23                                                                           ` Hui Zhu
2009-12-07 15:01                                                                             ` Hui Zhu
2009-12-12  8:41                                                                             ` Hui Zhu
2009-12-21 20:45                                                                               ` Tom Tromey
2009-12-22  3:18                                                                                 ` Hui Zhu
2009-09-08 16:54       ` Michael Snyder
2009-09-08 16:52     ` Michael Snyder
2009-09-08 16:50   ` Michael Snyder
2009-09-08 17:05     ` Joel Brobecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4ABE5E8D.8080209@vmware.com \
    --to=msnyder@vmware.com \
    --cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=teawater@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox