Re: [patch] Set bfd field in target_section

[Aleksandar Ristovski <aristovski@qnx.com>]

Pedro Alves wrote:
> On Tuesday 28 July 2009 15:34:41, Pedro Alves wrote:
>> On Tuesday 28 July 2009 15:28:33, Aleksandar Ristovski wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I believe this is related to Pedro's patch from 03-Jun-09. I 
>>> didn't see where we set target_section.bfd field - maybe I 
>>> am overlooking something, but in bfd-target, in function 
>>> target_bfd_xclose we will call bfd_close 
>>> (table->sections->bfd); bfd_close doesn't like NULL argument.
>>>
>>> Am I missing something, or is this (the patch) missing?
>> Doesn't add_to_section_table set the bfd in each new
>> target section?
> 
> I think you've got yourself an executable without any ALLOC
> section, hence the section table ends up empty.  I think something
> like this will fix the problem.  I'll give a test spin and
> apply it.
> 

Actually, I got it by mismatching libraries.