From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-65702-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 14886 invoked by alias); 28 Jul 2009 14:59:31 -0000
Received: (qmail 14876 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Jul 2009 14:59:31 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from qnxmail.qnx.com (HELO qnxmail.qnx.com) (209.226.137.76)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 14:59:22 +0000
Received: from Nebula.ott.qnx.com (nebula.ott.qnx.com [10.42.3.30]) 	by hub.ott.qnx.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA09851; 	Tue, 28 Jul 2009 10:59:15 -0400
Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([10.42.161.192]) by Nebula.ott.qnx.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); 	 Tue, 28 Jul 2009 10:59:20 -0400
Message-ID: <4A6F1237.5060508@qnx.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 15:57:00 -0000
From: Aleksandar Ristovski <aristovski@qnx.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Windows/20090605)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [patch] Set bfd field in target_section
References: <h4n1ui$nt3$1@ger.gmane.org> <200907281534.41605.pedro@codesourcery.com> <200907281551.29397.pedro@codesourcery.com>
In-Reply-To: <200907281551.29397.pedro@codesourcery.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-07/txt/msg00681.txt.bz2

Pedro Alves wrote:
> On Tuesday 28 July 2009 15:34:41, Pedro Alves wrote:
>> On Tuesday 28 July 2009 15:28:33, Aleksandar Ristovski wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I believe this is related to Pedro's patch from 03-Jun-09. I 
>>> didn't see where we set target_section.bfd field - maybe I 
>>> am overlooking something, but in bfd-target, in function 
>>> target_bfd_xclose we will call bfd_close 
>>> (table->sections->bfd); bfd_close doesn't like NULL argument.
>>>
>>> Am I missing something, or is this (the patch) missing?
>> Doesn't add_to_section_table set the bfd in each new
>> target section?
> 
> I think you've got yourself an executable without any ALLOC
> section, hence the section table ends up empty.  I think something
> like this will fix the problem.  I'll give a test spin and
> apply it.
> 

Actually, I got it by mismatching libraries.