Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: Aleksandar Ristovski <aristovski@qnx.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] Set bfd field in target_section
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 15:16:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200907281551.29397.pedro@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200907281534.41605.pedro@codesourcery.com>

On Tuesday 28 July 2009 15:34:41, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On Tuesday 28 July 2009 15:28:33, Aleksandar Ristovski wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > I believe this is related to Pedro's patch from 03-Jun-09. I 
> > didn't see where we set target_section.bfd field - maybe I 
> > am overlooking something, but in bfd-target, in function 
> > target_bfd_xclose we will call bfd_close 
> > (table->sections->bfd); bfd_close doesn't like NULL argument.
> > 
> > Am I missing something, or is this (the patch) missing?
> 
> Doesn't add_to_section_table set the bfd in each new
> target section?

I think you've got yourself an executable without any ALLOC
section, hence the section table ends up empty.  I think something
like this will fix the problem.  I'll give a test spin and
apply it.

-- 
Pedro Alves

---
 gdb/bfd-target.c |   11 ++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Index: src/gdb/bfd-target.c
===================================================================
--- src.orig/gdb/bfd-target.c	2009-07-28 15:43:27.000000000 +0100
+++ src/gdb/bfd-target.c	2009-07-28 15:47:33.000000000 +0100
@@ -54,7 +54,10 @@ static void
 target_bfd_xclose (struct target_ops *t, int quitting)
 {
   struct target_section_table *table = t->to_data;
-  if (table->sections)
+
+  /* If the target sections table is empty, the bfd had already been
+     closed.  */
+  if (table->sections != table->sections_end)
     bfd_close (table->sections->bfd);
   xfree (table->sections);
   xfree (table);
@@ -70,6 +73,12 @@ target_bfd_reopen (struct bfd *bfd)
   table = XZALLOC (struct target_section_table);
   build_section_table (bfd, &table->sections, &table->sections_end);
 
+  /* No use keeping the bfd open if there are no target sections we
+     care about.  This way, we avoid keeping the bfd pointer stored
+     somewhere so that target_bfd_xclose could use it.  */
+  if (table->sections == table->sections_end)
+    bfd_close (bfd);
+
   t = XZALLOC (struct target_ops);
   t->to_shortname = "bfd";
   t->to_longname = _("BFD backed target");


  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-07-28 14:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-07-28 14:46 Aleksandar Ristovski
2009-07-28 14:51 ` Pedro Alves
2009-07-28 14:59   ` Pedro Alves
2009-07-28 15:06   ` Aleksandar Ristovski
2009-07-28 16:22     ` Pedro Alves
2009-07-28 16:37       ` Aleksandar Ristovski
2009-07-28 16:37         ` Pedro Alves
2009-07-28 21:48           ` Aleksandar Ristovski
2009-08-08 16:54             ` Pedro Alves
2009-07-28 15:16   ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2009-07-28 15:57     ` Aleksandar Ristovski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200907281551.29397.pedro@codesourcery.com \
    --to=pedro@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=aristovski@qnx.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox