From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] Move gdbsupport to top level
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 16:07:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <437c1b86-0aa8-57b9-53e2-f21567e2bb14@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8a8de6a9-37b8-cad3-c818-be903037fe48@redhat.com>
On 1/15/20 2:41 PM, Pedro Alves wrote:
> Don't know what I think of gnulib headers including <config.h>.
> Maybe we should rename gdb's config.h to gdb-config.h too.
Hit reply to soon. I meant to add,
... and then, add a manually-written config.h in the build
dir that does:
#include <gdbsupport/support-config.h>
#include <gdb-config.h>
We'd do the same to gdbsupport, add a config.h in its
build dir that does:
#include "gnulib/config.h"
#include <support-config.h>
Those config.h files would go in the build dirs so that
they're not picked by other build directories.
With that, any "#include <config.h>" in any header ends up
picking the currently-being-built project's config.h, plus
the dependencies' config.h files.
Just a half-baked thought. Not sure it's the best idea.
Thanks,
Pedro Alves
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-15 14:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-09 0:58 Tom Tromey
2020-01-09 0:58 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] Consolidate definition of USE_WIN32API Tom Tromey
2020-01-09 0:58 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] Add gdbsupport check-defines script Tom Tromey
2020-01-09 0:58 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] Remove use of <config.h> from gdb/nat/ Tom Tromey
2020-01-09 0:58 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] Don't link gdb twice against libiberty Tom Tromey
2020-01-11 16:58 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] Move gdbsupport to top level Tom Tromey
2020-01-12 2:48 ` Simon Marchi
2020-01-14 23:25 ` Tom Tromey
2020-01-15 0:36 ` Tom Tromey
2020-01-15 21:27 ` Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches
2020-01-17 18:02 ` Tom Tromey
2020-01-15 14:30 ` Pedro Alves
[not found] ` <8a8de6a9-37b8-cad3-c818-be903037fe48@redhat.com>
2020-01-15 16:07 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
[not found] ` <87c733a2-2b25-a954-88a1-9bfb1a7eca12@redhat.com>
2020-01-15 21:46 ` Pedro Alves
2020-01-15 22:12 ` Pedro Alves
2020-01-16 0:48 ` Pedro Alves
2020-01-16 2:57 ` Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches
2020-01-16 17:22 ` Pedro Alves
2020-01-16 18:01 ` Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches
2020-01-16 18:28 ` Pedro Alves
2020-01-16 19:21 ` Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches
2020-01-16 9:02 ` Simon Marchi
2020-01-16 15:24 ` Pedro Alves
2020-01-17 12:20 ` Simon Marchi
2020-01-17 13:37 ` Pedro Alves
2020-01-17 14:40 ` Simon Marchi
2020-01-17 15:32 ` Pedro Alves
2020-01-17 18:13 ` Tom Tromey
2020-01-16 4:23 ` Simon Marchi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=437c1b86-0aa8-57b9-53e2-f21567e2bb14@redhat.com \
--to=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=tom@tromey.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox