From: Jeff Johnston <jjohnstn@redhat.com>
To: Michael Chastain <mec.gnu@mindspring.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA]: Fix for pending breakpoints in manually loaded/unloaded shlibs
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2004 20:44:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41363482.7030204@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41362333.nail1N211MB10@mindspring.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1600 bytes --]
Michael Chastain wrote:
> Jeff Johnston <jjohnstn@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>>Thanks. Patches committed, including fix to the testcase.
>
>
> Uh, I haven't approved that fix.
>
> I wrote:
>
> If the test script accepts both old+new messages, and the new message is
> not wildly more complex than the old message, then testing with the old
> message alone is good enough for getting the test script approved.
> Just pop out the new patch and say how / what system you tested on.
>
> You needed to send a fresh patch to gdb-patches, say how you tested it,
> and then get it approved. I'm sorry if this wasn't clear from my message.
> Sometimes I do write too colloquially.
>
> This is actually a live issue because the patch you committed has
> a problem:
>
> -"Continuing.*y is 7.*warning: Temporarily disabling unloaded shared library breakpoints.*warning: breakpoint #.*Program exited normally." \
> -"continuing to end of program second time"
> +"Continuing.*y is 7.*warning: Temporarily disabling breakpoints for.*unloadshr.sl.*Program exited normally." \
> +"continuing to end of program"
>
> Now there are two tests with the identical name "continuing to end
> of program", which leads to confusion.
>
> Can you please: fix that; say which system you tested it on;
> and submit a patch to gdb-patches?
>
Oops, my bad. Sorry about that.
Tested on x86-linux, ia64-linux, x86_64-linux, s390-linux.
Patch attached to fix problem above.
2004-09-01 Jeff Johnston <jjohnstn@redhat.com>
* gdb.base/unload.exp: Fix so messages aren't duplicated.
> Michael
>
[-- Attachment #2: unload.patch3 --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 562 bytes --]
Index: gdb.base/unload.exp
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/unload.exp,v
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -p -r1.2 unload.exp
--- gdb.base/unload.exp 1 Sep 2004 17:56:20 -0000 1.2
+++ gdb.base/unload.exp 1 Sep 2004 20:40:57 -0000
@@ -139,5 +139,5 @@ gdb_test "run" \
gdb_test "continue" \
"Continuing.*y is 7.*warning: Temporarily disabling breakpoints for.*unloadshr.sl.*Program exited normally." \
-"continuing to end of program"
+"continuing to end of program second time"
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-01 20:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-10 19:09 Jeff Johnston
2004-08-10 19:45 ` Kevin Buettner
2004-08-11 4:07 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-08-11 15:58 ` Jeff Johnston
2004-08-11 16:58 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-08-11 17:59 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-08-11 20:42 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-08-11 20:47 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-08-11 22:19 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-08-12 12:58 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-08-12 13:16 ` New observer objfile_mapped; was Andrew Cagney
2004-08-12 13:18 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-08-12 3:45 ` [RFA]: Fix for pending breakpoints in manually loaded/unloaded shlibs Eli Zaretskii
2004-08-12 12:10 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-08-12 18:49 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-08-12 20:44 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-08-14 11:50 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-08-18 13:45 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-08-19 3:57 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-08-11 8:09 ` Michael Chastain
2004-08-11 15:42 ` Jeff Johnston
2004-08-12 13:05 ` Michael Chastain
2004-08-12 13:33 ` Michael Chastain
2004-08-12 17:47 ` Jeff Johnston
2004-08-12 18:59 ` Michael Chastain
2004-08-12 20:23 ` Jeff Johnston
2004-08-11 17:12 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-08-11 20:12 ` Jeff Johnston
2004-08-18 13:56 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-08-18 19:22 ` Jeff Johnston
2004-08-18 19:39 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-08-18 20:03 ` Jeff Johnston
2004-08-19 4:01 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-09-01 15:15 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-09-01 18:01 ` Jeff Johnston
2004-09-01 19:30 ` Michael Chastain
2004-09-01 20:44 ` Jeff Johnston [this message]
2004-09-01 20:59 ` Michael Chastain
2004-09-01 23:27 ` Jeff Johnston
2004-09-02 3:54 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-08-23 21:33 ` Jeff Johnston
2004-08-23 22:09 ` Michael Chastain
2004-08-23 22:35 ` Jeff Johnston
2004-08-24 2:26 ` Michael Chastain
2004-08-24 15:51 ` Jeff Johnston
2004-08-24 16:04 ` Michael Chastain
2004-08-12 2:48 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-08-12 3:54 ` Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41363482.7030204@redhat.com \
--to=jjohnstn@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=mec.gnu@mindspring.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox