Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
To: Jeff Johnston <jjohnstn@redhat.com>
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA]: Fix for pending breakpoints in manually loaded/unloaded shlibs
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 16:58:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <411A5012.3000508@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <411A4209.6020801@redhat.com>

> Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 
>>> Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 15:09:37 -0400
>>> From: Jeff Johnston <jjohnstn@redhat.com>
>>>
>>> To fix this, I have added an observer for a new event: solib_unloaded.  When update_solib_list discovers a shared library has been unloaded, it notifies all observers (initially this is just breakpoint.c).  Breakpoint.c sets up an observer to find all breakpoints in the removed shlib and mark them as non-inserted and bp_shlib_disabled.  This solves the problem.
>>
>>
>>
>> Could you please explain why this complicated mechanism is needed to
>> fix this problem?  Why cannot GDB directly mark the breakpoints when
>> the library is unloaded, instead of going the observer path?
>>
> 
> Kind of damned if I do, damned if I don't :) I had talked over the problem with Andrew and he suggested the observer path as this is an event that other parts of gdb would be interested in knowing about.  IMHO, the mechanism is rather elegant, extensible, and simple to use.

Right.  In addition to the breakpoints, the MI needs to know about these 
identical events (so that it can notify the gui of an shlib unload).

Andrew



  reply	other threads:[~2004-08-11 16:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-08-10 19:09 Jeff Johnston
2004-08-10 19:45 ` Kevin Buettner
2004-08-11  4:07 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-08-11 15:58   ` Jeff Johnston
2004-08-11 16:58     ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2004-08-11 17:59       ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-08-11 20:42         ` Andrew Cagney
2004-08-11 20:47           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-08-11 22:19             ` Andrew Cagney
2004-08-12 12:58               ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-08-12 13:16                 ` New observer objfile_mapped; was Andrew Cagney
2004-08-12 13:18                   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-08-12  3:45           ` [RFA]: Fix for pending breakpoints in manually loaded/unloaded shlibs Eli Zaretskii
2004-08-12 12:10             ` Andrew Cagney
2004-08-12 18:49               ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-08-12 20:44                 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-08-14 11:50                   ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-08-18 13:45                     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-08-19  3:57                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-08-11  8:09 ` Michael Chastain
2004-08-11 15:42   ` Jeff Johnston
2004-08-12 13:05     ` Michael Chastain
2004-08-12 13:33     ` Michael Chastain
2004-08-12 17:47       ` Jeff Johnston
2004-08-12 18:59         ` Michael Chastain
2004-08-12 20:23           ` Jeff Johnston
2004-08-11 17:12 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-08-11 20:12   ` Jeff Johnston
2004-08-18 13:56     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-08-18 19:22       ` Jeff Johnston
2004-08-18 19:39         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-08-18 20:03           ` Jeff Johnston
2004-08-19  4:01             ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-09-01 15:15               ` Andrew Cagney
2004-09-01 18:01                 ` Jeff Johnston
2004-09-01 19:30                   ` Michael Chastain
2004-09-01 20:44                     ` Jeff Johnston
2004-09-01 20:59                       ` Michael Chastain
2004-09-01 23:27                         ` Jeff Johnston
2004-09-02  3:54                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-08-23 21:33             ` Jeff Johnston
2004-08-23 22:09               ` Michael Chastain
2004-08-23 22:35                 ` Jeff Johnston
2004-08-24  2:26                   ` Michael Chastain
2004-08-24 15:51                     ` Jeff Johnston
2004-08-24 16:04                       ` Michael Chastain
2004-08-12  2:48 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-08-12  3:54   ` Eli Zaretskii

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=411A5012.3000508@gnu.org \
    --to=cagney@gnu.org \
    --cc=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=jjohnstn@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox