Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Johnston <jjohnstn@redhat.com>
To: Michael Chastain <mec.gnu@mindspring.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, eliz@gnu.org, drow@false.org
Subject: Re: [RFA]: Fix for pending breakpoints in manually loaded/unloaded shlibs
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 22:35:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <412A713C.1020004@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <412A6B08.nailD8G118X9H@mindspring.com>

Michael Chastain wrote:
> The test script is not quite okay.
> 
> The test script should match the output from the last released gdb,
> gdb 6.2, as well as the current gdb.
> 

The test should behave the same because the gdb code that generates the message 
it is checking hasn't been committed yet.  On retrospect, perhaps I should not 
have committed the testcase in with this particular check in place (the test 
itself is a valid one regardless).  There has been some questions regarding 
whether I should be using an observer or not.  Knowing that, do I still need to 
do the following or can I check the change I attached in once I get final 
approval on the code and most importantly, the message to be issued?

> When I compare gdb 6.2 with gdb HEAD, or with gdb 6.2.91 (when it
> comes out), I use the same current test suite with both the old
> and new gdb's.  I can't compare:
> 
>   (gdb 6.2, suite 6.2)
>   (gdb 6.2.91, suite 6.2.91)
>   
> ... because there are thousands of new tests and test name changes.
> So I have to compare:
> 
>   (gdb 6.2, suite 6.2.91)
>   (gdb 6.2.91, suite 6.2.91)
> 
> So it helps me if the test suite continues to match
> the messages from the last released gdb.
> 
> If you're curious, you can see some of these comparison tables here:
> 
>   http://www.shout.net/~mec/sunday/2004-08-18/Compare-by-gdb-branch-HEAD.html
> 
> ===
> 
> You can do this either by fuzzing the pattern up with some wild cards,
> or with the "(...|...)" construct, or by using a gdb_test_multiple
> with one arm for the old output and one arm for the new.
> Personally I would go for gdb_test_multiple:
> 
>   set name "continuing to end of program"
>   gdb_test_multiple "continue" $name {
>     -re "Continuing.*y is 7.*warning: ... disabling unloaded shared library breakpoints ....*$gdb_prompt $" {
>       # old gdb 6.2
>       pass $name
>     }
>     -re "Continuing.*y is 7.*warning: ... disabling breakpoints for.*unloadshr.sl.* ... $gdb_prompt $" {
>       # new gdb HEAD 2004-08-23
>       pass $name
>     }
>   }
> 
> Also, what system did you test on?
> 
> ===
> 
> 2004-08-23  Jeff Johnston  <jjohnstn@redhat.com>
> 
> 	* gdb.base/unload.exp: Fix expected warning message to match
> 	latest format.
> 
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2004-08-23 22:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-08-10 19:09 Jeff Johnston
2004-08-10 19:45 ` Kevin Buettner
2004-08-11  4:07 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-08-11 15:58   ` Jeff Johnston
2004-08-11 16:58     ` Andrew Cagney
2004-08-11 17:59       ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-08-11 20:42         ` Andrew Cagney
2004-08-11 20:47           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-08-11 22:19             ` Andrew Cagney
2004-08-12 12:58               ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-08-12 13:16                 ` New observer objfile_mapped; was Andrew Cagney
2004-08-12 13:18                   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-08-12  3:45           ` [RFA]: Fix for pending breakpoints in manually loaded/unloaded shlibs Eli Zaretskii
2004-08-12 12:10             ` Andrew Cagney
2004-08-12 18:49               ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-08-12 20:44                 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-08-14 11:50                   ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-08-18 13:45                     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-08-19  3:57                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-08-11  8:09 ` Michael Chastain
2004-08-11 15:42   ` Jeff Johnston
2004-08-12 13:05     ` Michael Chastain
2004-08-12 13:33     ` Michael Chastain
2004-08-12 17:47       ` Jeff Johnston
2004-08-12 18:59         ` Michael Chastain
2004-08-12 20:23           ` Jeff Johnston
2004-08-11 17:12 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-08-11 20:12   ` Jeff Johnston
2004-08-18 13:56     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-08-18 19:22       ` Jeff Johnston
2004-08-18 19:39         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-08-18 20:03           ` Jeff Johnston
2004-08-19  4:01             ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-09-01 15:15               ` Andrew Cagney
2004-09-01 18:01                 ` Jeff Johnston
2004-09-01 19:30                   ` Michael Chastain
2004-09-01 20:44                     ` Jeff Johnston
2004-09-01 20:59                       ` Michael Chastain
2004-09-01 23:27                         ` Jeff Johnston
2004-09-02  3:54                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-08-23 21:33             ` Jeff Johnston
2004-08-23 22:09               ` Michael Chastain
2004-08-23 22:35                 ` Jeff Johnston [this message]
2004-08-24  2:26                   ` Michael Chastain
2004-08-24 15:51                     ` Jeff Johnston
2004-08-24 16:04                       ` Michael Chastain
2004-08-12  2:48 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-08-12  3:54   ` Eli Zaretskii

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=412A713C.1020004@redhat.com \
    --to=jjohnstn@redhat.com \
    --cc=drow@false.org \
    --cc=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=mec.gnu@mindspring.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox