Re: [RFA]: Fix for pending breakpoints in manually loaded/unloaded shlibs

[Jeff Johnston <jjohnstn@redhat.com>]

Michael Chastain wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
> 
> What system(s) did you test this on?
>

I tested on a Red Hat x86-linux system.  I am fixing a bug reported on Red Hat 
Linux.

> For a shared library test the binutils version is important so
> include that too.
> 

binutils-2.14.90.0.4-26.3

> Do you have access to any non-linux systems?  I think this needs to be
> tested on at least one non-linux system before it goes in.  If you can't
> do it, I can hop on an hpux machine and do that part.
>

If you could do that, that would be appreciated.

>   Please email any bugs, comments, and/or additions to this file to:
>   bug-gdb@prep.ai.mit.edu  */
> 
>     This address is dead, please drop these lines.
> 
> All the gunk to build shared libraries cries out for some library
> code in lib/gdb.exp or lib/dl-support.exp.  That's my job;
> it's okay for you to keep cloning the code until I get to this.
> 
> Once I get past that the rest of unload.exp looks okay.
> 

I'll remove the lines.  Thanks.

> Michael C
> 
> ===
> 
> 2004-08-10  Jeff Johnston  <jjohnstn@redhat.com>
> 
>          * gdb.base/unload.exp: New test for breakpoints in dynamically
>          loaded libraries.
>          * gdb.base/unload.c: Ditto.
>          * gdb.base/unloadshr.c: Ditto.
>