Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec.gnu@mindspring.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, vinschen@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFA] gdb.cp/classes.exp: Don't try to print local variable out of scope
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 00:09:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <404E2B2C.8030201@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040309161507.9FBF54B104@berman.michael-chastain.com>

> 1 void foo ()
>   2 {
>   3   int i = 1;
>   4   {
>   5     int i = 2;
>   6     bar(i);
>   7   }
>   8   bar (i);
>   9 }
> 
> cv> Is line 7 still in the scope of the inner definition of variable `i'?
> cv> Which `i' should be printed at that point?
> 
> My intuition says that the inner "i" is in scope at line 7.

Yes, the inner "i" should be in scope.  That line, which hasn't yet been 
executed, will destory the inner block.  I think that is covered by the 
GCC-O0 rule?

Andrew




WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec.gnu@mindspring.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, vinschen@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFA] gdb.cp/classes.exp: Don't try to print local variable out of scope
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 20:38:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <404E2B2C.8030201@gnu.org> (raw)
Message-ID: <20040309203800.NOe6HrB_UGTJyniAsaU6NJIoD_LBez9kV4At9wugBPA@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040309161507.9FBF54B104@berman.michael-chastain.com>

> 1 void foo ()
>   2 {
>   3   int i = 1;
>   4   {
>   5     int i = 2;
>   6     bar(i);
>   7   }
>   8   bar (i);
>   9 }
> 
> cv> Is line 7 still in the scope of the inner definition of variable `i'?
> cv> Which `i' should be printed at that point?
> 
> My intuition says that the inner "i" is in scope at line 7.

Yes, the inner "i" should be in scope.  That line, which hasn't yet been 
executed, will destory the inner block.  I think that is covered by the 
GCC-O0 rule?

Andrew




  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-03-09 20:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-03-19  0:09 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2004-03-09 16:15 ` Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2004-03-19  0:09 ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2004-03-09 20:38   ` Andrew Cagney
2004-03-09 21:27   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-03-09 22:32     ` Andrew Cagney
2004-03-19  0:09       ` Andrew Cagney
2004-03-19  0:09       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-03-10  0:56         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-03-19  0:09         ` Andrew Cagney
2004-03-10  1:51           ` Andrew Cagney
2004-03-10  3:05           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-03-19  0:09             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-03-19  0:09             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-03-10  3:23               ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-03-10 22:21               ` Andrew Cagney
2004-03-10 22:29                 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-03-15 18:47                   ` Andrew Cagney
2004-03-19  0:09                     ` Andrew Cagney
2004-03-19  0:09                   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-03-19  0:09                 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-03-19  0:09     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-03-19  0:09 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2004-03-09 15:27 ` Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2004-03-19  0:09 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2004-03-09 15:11 ` Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2004-03-09 15:40 ` Corinna Vinschen
2004-03-19  0:09   ` Corinna Vinschen
2004-03-19  0:09 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-03-09 15:20   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-03-19  0:09 Corinna Vinschen
2004-03-09 13:00 ` Corinna Vinschen
2004-03-19  0:09 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-03-09 14:17   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-03-19  0:09 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2004-03-10 23:58 ` Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2004-03-19  0:09 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2004-03-10  2:06 ` Michael Elizabeth Chastain

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=404E2B2C.8030201@gnu.org \
    --to=cagney@gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=mec.gnu@mindspring.com \
    --cc=vinschen@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox