Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain)
To: carlton@kealia.com, drow@mvista.com, vinschen@redhat.com
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFA] gdb.cp/classes.exp: Don't try to print local variable out of scope
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 15:11:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040309151111.DE3094B104@berman.michael-chastain.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20040309151100.HMCY1ycsK6LgFzMkP8efC6sxOkL5AU0I7VUO59SCrkI@z> (raw)

Hi Corinna,

cv> Basically, the testsuite tries to print the value of a local variable
cv> on a closing brace.  This fails due to the debug info given in this
cv> case:

I have been seeing this also on native i686-pc-linux-gnu.

cv> When the testsuite steps to the closing brace of the function, $pc is
cv> set to the first instruction of the epilogue.  This is exactly the
cv> first instruction which doesn't belong to the lexical block anymore.
cv> Logically, the local variable doesn't exist anymore at this point.

Right.

I want to raise the question: is this really a bug in the gdb test suite,
or is it a bug in gcc?

That is: is a local variable required to exist at the closing brace of a
function?

I think your answer is "no, it's not required to exist, therefore the
gdb test suite should change".  My answer is "reluctantly, no,
it's not required to exist"; I don't think the famous gcc -O0
debug info clause covers this case.  I'm curious what drow and
carlton and other people have to say.

  void foo ()
  {
    int i;
    i = 1;
    bar (i);
  }

  (gdb) break bar
  (gdb) run
  (gdb) finish
  (gdb) print i

Is it okay for gcc to emit debug info that "i" is out of scope here?

cv> I'd suggest to change the testsuite case to add another line to the
cv> function enums1(), so that it's sure to be still in the scope of the
cv> local variable obj_with_enum.

misc.cc is used by three *.exp files so I do not want to touch it
at all, so I am dis-approving your patch.  I will write a patch to
remove the "gdb_test next" in test_enums instead.

Michael C


             reply	other threads:[~2004-03-09 15:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-03-19  0:09 Michael Elizabeth Chastain [this message]
2004-03-09 15:11 ` Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2004-03-09 15:40 ` Corinna Vinschen
2004-03-19  0:09   ` Corinna Vinschen
2004-03-19  0:09 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-03-09 15:20   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-03-19  0:09 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2004-03-09 15:27 ` Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2004-03-19  0:09 Corinna Vinschen
2004-03-09 13:00 ` Corinna Vinschen
2004-03-19  0:09 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-03-09 14:17   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-03-19  0:09 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2004-03-10 23:58 ` Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2004-03-19  0:09 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2004-03-10  2:06 ` Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2004-03-19  0:09 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2004-03-09 16:15 ` Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2004-03-19  0:09 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-03-09 20:38   ` Andrew Cagney
2004-03-09 21:27   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-03-09 22:32     ` Andrew Cagney
2004-03-19  0:09       ` Andrew Cagney
2004-03-19  0:09       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-03-10  0:56         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-03-19  0:09         ` Andrew Cagney
2004-03-10  1:51           ` Andrew Cagney
2004-03-10  3:05           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-03-19  0:09             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-03-19  0:09             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-03-10  3:23               ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-03-10 22:21               ` Andrew Cagney
2004-03-10 22:29                 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-03-15 18:47                   ` Andrew Cagney
2004-03-19  0:09                     ` Andrew Cagney
2004-03-19  0:09                   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-03-19  0:09                 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-03-19  0:09     ` Daniel Jacobowitz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040309151111.DE3094B104@berman.michael-chastain.com \
    --to=mec.gnu@mindspring.com \
    --cc=carlton@kealia.com \
    --cc=drow@mvista.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=vinschen@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox