From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: Peter Bergner <bergner@vnet.ibm.com>,
Ulrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com>,
gdb-patches@sourceware.org,
binutils <binutils@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] Add support for choosing disassembler cpu in GDB for POWER.
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 14:30:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3b814d5e-f716-f1c7-1530-684901b28e30@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4f8959a7-33b9-385c-3c63-2d5b26286579@vnet.ibm.com>
On 10/28/2016 03:24 PM, Peter Bergner wrote:
> On 10/28/16 9:10 AM, Pedro Alves wrote:
>> Maybe not. Where are the per-arch settings stored?
>
> They're stored in the gdbarch...
You mean, as a new string member of gdbarch? That sounds
problematic, since you can have multiple different gdbarch
instances for the same architecture live at the same time.
BTC, I'm talking about where does the FOO
in "set disassembler-options FOO" end up stored.
>
>> Maybe it doesn't even make sense to consider this
>> setting per-arch. Maybe per-inferior would be better.
>
> I have no idea how to do that, so I think I'll stick with
> a per-arch setting and maybe down the line, someone can
> extend it to that.
That's super fine with me.
Thanks,
Pedro Alves
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-28 14:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-30 2:14 Peter Bergner
2016-09-30 17:55 ` Ulrich Weigand
2016-10-03 20:25 ` Peter Bergner
2016-10-03 22:25 ` Alan Modra
2016-10-06 3:00 ` Peter Bergner
2016-10-06 4:44 ` Alan Modra
2016-10-06 9:52 ` Pedro Alves
2016-10-06 19:26 ` Peter Bergner
2016-10-07 19:21 ` Ulrich Weigand
2016-10-07 21:01 ` Peter Bergner
2016-10-08 14:39 ` Ulrich Weigand
2016-10-10 23:28 ` Peter Bergner
2016-10-12 8:08 ` Ulrich Weigand
2016-10-12 10:46 ` Pedro Alves
2016-10-11 0:09 ` Pedro Alves
2016-10-11 18:49 ` Peter Bergner
2016-10-12 8:25 ` Ulrich Weigand
2016-10-27 0:04 ` Peter Bergner
2016-10-27 9:40 ` Pedro Alves
2016-10-28 13:47 ` Peter Bergner
2016-10-28 14:10 ` Pedro Alves
2016-10-28 14:24 ` Peter Bergner
2016-10-28 14:30 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2016-10-28 14:53 ` Peter Bergner
2016-11-03 11:01 ` Pedro Alves
2016-11-03 15:02 ` Peter Bergner
2016-11-03 15:06 ` Peter Bergner
2016-11-03 16:41 ` Ulrich Weigand
2016-11-03 16:49 ` Peter Bergner
2016-10-28 12:32 ` Ulrich Weigand
2016-10-28 13:45 ` Peter Bergner
2016-10-28 14:15 ` Ulrich Weigand
2016-10-28 15:02 ` Peter Bergner
2016-10-28 18:47 ` Ulrich Weigand
2016-11-02 23:28 ` Peter Bergner
2016-10-12 19:35 ` Pedro Alves
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3b814d5e-f716-f1c7-1530-684901b28e30@redhat.com \
--to=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=amodra@gmail.com \
--cc=bergner@vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox