Re: [PATCH] Objective-C language support.

[Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>]

> Adam Fedor wrote:
> 
>> 
>> This patch adds Objective-C language support to gdb based upon a patch
>> provided by Apple Computer Inc from their version of gdb. Note that the
>> patch only contains changes to existing files. New files (objc-lang.h,
>> objc-lang.c, objc-exp.y) and a gdb.objc testsuite directory are located at
>> 
>> ftp://ftp.gnustep.org/pub/gnustep/contrib/gdb-objc-patch.tar.gz
> 
> 
> Adam, this bit can't hurt anything, since it just adds some new enum
> values.  Only one suggestion -- how about putting OP_THIS and OP_SELF
> consecutively, because they're so similar?  Also please hold off on
> the export of evaluate_subexp -- let's handle that separately.
> 
> Other than that, approved.  Wait a couple days for objections, then
> you can commit it.
> 
> 
> 
>>         * expression.h: New ops NSSTRING, SELECTOR, MSGCALL, and SELF.
> 
> 
>> Index: gdb/expression.h
>> ===================================================================
>> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/expression.h,v
>> retrieving revision 1.4
>> diff -u -p -r1.4 expression.h
>> --- gdb/expression.h    1 Aug 2002 17:18:32 -0000       1.4
>> +++ gdb/expression.h    17 Sep 2002 19:30:05 -0000
>> @@ -181,6 +181,12 @@ enum exp_opcode
>>         making three exp_elements.  */
>>      OP_FUNCALL,
>> 
>> +    /* OP_MSGCALL is followed by a string in the next exp_element and then an
>> +       integer.  The string is the selector string.  The integer is the number
>> +       of arguments to the message call.  That many plus one values are used,
>> +       the first one being the object pointer.  This is an Objective C message */
>> +    OP_MSGCALL,
>> +

FYI, I think these should be renamed to OP_OBJC_xxxx so that it is very 
clear that these have Objective C semantics.  Otherwize I think it runs 
the risk of people trying to re-use these operators in other languages.

This would be consistent with the Ada OPS where I recommended 
OP_ADA_xxxx for the Ada specific extensions to the operator table.

Andrew


>>      /* This is EXACTLY like OP_FUNCALL but is semantically different.
>>         In F77, array subscript expressions, substring expressions
>>         and function calls are  all exactly the same syntactically. They may
>> @@ -273,11 +279,17 @@ enum exp_opcode
>>      STRUCTOP_STRUCT,
>>      STRUCTOP_PTR,
>> 
>> -    /* C++ */
>> -    /* OP_THIS is just a placeholder for the class instance variable.
>> +    /* C++: OP_THIS is just a placeholder for the class instance variable.
>>         It just comes in a tight (OP_THIS, OP_THIS) pair.  */
>>      OP_THIS,
>> 
>> +    /* Objective C: "@selector" pseudo-operator */
>> +    OP_SELECTOR,
>> +
>> +    /* Objective-C: OP_SELF is just a placeholder for the class instance
>> +       variable.  It just comes in a tight (OP_SELF, OP_SELF) pair.  */
>> +    OP_SELF,
>> +
>>      /* OP_SCOPE surrounds a type name and a field name.  The type
>>         name is encoded as one element, but the field name stays as
>>         a string, which, of course, is variable length.  */
>> @@ -305,7 +317,10 @@ enum exp_opcode
>>      OP_NAME,
>> 
>>      /* An unparsed expression.  Used for Scheme (for now at least) */
>> -    OP_EXPRSTRING
>> +    OP_EXPRSTRING,
>> +
>> +    /* An Objective C Foundation Class NSString constant */
>> +    OP_NSSTRING,
>>    };
>> 
>>  union exp_element
>> @@ -369,6 +384,10 @@ enum noside
>> 
>>  extern struct value *evaluate_subexp_standard
>>    (struct type *, struct expression *, int *, enum noside);
>> +
>> +extern struct value *evaluate_subexp (struct type *, struct expression *,
>> +                                     int *, enum noside);
>> +
>> 
>>  /* From expprint.c */
>>
> 
>