From: Adam Fedor <fedor@doc.com>
To: Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Objective-C language support.
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 13:31:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D88E2AB.1060505@doc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3D88BCD1.5379F383@redhat.com>
Michael Snyder wrote:
> Adam Fedor wrote:
>
>>This patch adds Objective-C language support to gdb based upon a patch
>>provided by Apple Computer Inc from their version of gdb. Note that the
>>patch only contains changes to existing files. New files (objc-lang.h,
>>objc-lang.c, objc-exp.y) and a gdb.objc testsuite directory are located at
>>
>>ftp://ftp.gnustep.org/pub/gnustep/contrib/gdb-objc-patch.tar.gz
>>
>
> There's a good chance that I wrote some of this code
> anyway, so I'll try to have a look at it. You know,
> of course, that we can't just drop something this huge
> into the source tree without some review...
>
Well I though it would just be reject outright, so I guess I'm doing
relatively good :-)
> I'll need the ability to run the tests. Does GCC already
> have enough objc to compile them? Will I need any special
> libraries?
It's been tested with gcc 2.95 and 3.X. It should work with any gcc out
of the box. Only libobjc which comes with gcc.
> Any chance of getting the original authors' names for the
> changelog, instead of / in addition to yours?
I looked at the ChangeLog that came with the patch, but most changes
didn't have anything to do with the patches I submitted, or it was hard
for me to match an entry with an actual change in the code. I could try
to look at CVS logs, but that could be tedious and Jason Molenda has
said that most of those are null.
--
Adam Fedor, Digital Optics Corp. | I'm glad I hate spinach, because
http://www.doc.com | if I didn't, I'd eat it, and you
| know how I hate the stuff.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-09-18 20:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-09-18 8:24 Adam Fedor
2002-09-18 10:50 ` Michael Snyder
2002-09-18 11:57 ` Michael Snyder
2002-09-18 11:57 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-09-18 12:04 ` Michael Snyder
2002-09-18 12:14 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-09-18 12:17 ` Michael Snyder
2002-09-18 13:51 ` Adam Fedor
2002-09-18 15:00 ` Michael Snyder
2002-09-18 15:19 ` Adam Fedor
2002-09-18 15:25 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-09-18 11:59 ` Daniel Berlin
2002-09-18 13:31 ` Adam Fedor [this message]
2002-09-18 14:03 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-10-08 16:36 ` Michael Snyder
2002-10-11 19:29 ` Adam Fedor
2002-10-08 16:42 ` Michael Snyder
2002-10-11 19:44 ` Adam Fedor
2002-10-21 15:18 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-10-21 15:27 ` Michael Snyder
2002-10-08 16:45 ` Michael Snyder
2002-10-11 19:39 ` Adam Fedor
2002-10-08 16:51 ` Michael Snyder
2002-10-14 13:06 ` Jim Blandy
2002-10-21 15:28 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-10-22 17:04 ` Michael Snyder
2002-10-22 18:42 ` Elena Zannoni
2002-10-08 16:58 ` Michael Snyder
2002-10-14 19:18 ` Adam Fedor
2002-10-21 15:31 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-10-08 17:01 ` Michael Snyder
2002-10-14 13:08 ` Jim Blandy
2002-10-18 10:06 ` Adam Fedor
2002-10-08 17:05 ` Michael Snyder
2002-10-14 13:14 ` Jim Blandy
2002-10-14 20:09 ` Adam Fedor
2002-10-18 14:24 ` Elena Zannoni
2002-10-22 5:49 ` Jim Blandy
2002-10-22 14:23 ` Michael Snyder
2002-10-21 15:25 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-11-07 23:44 ` Jim Blandy
2002-11-08 7:16 ` Elena Zannoni
2002-10-08 17:07 ` Michael Snyder
2002-10-11 20:06 ` Adam Fedor
2002-10-08 17:14 ` Michael Snyder
2002-10-13 18:51 ` Adam Fedor
2002-10-08 17:16 ` Michael Snyder
2002-10-12 11:37 ` Adam Fedor
2002-10-08 17:19 ` Michael Snyder
2002-10-14 19:33 ` Adam Fedor
2002-10-16 12:16 ` Michael Snyder
2002-10-08 17:30 ` Michael Snyder
2002-10-13 19:06 ` Adam Fedor
2002-10-21 15:35 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-10-21 16:19 ` Michael Snyder
2002-10-23 12:23 ` Michael Snyder
2002-10-23 12:36 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-10-23 13:10 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-10-23 14:37 ` Michael Snyder
2002-10-23 14:35 ` Michael Snyder
2002-10-08 17:34 ` Michael Snyder
2002-10-13 19:12 ` Adam Fedor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3D88E2AB.1060505@doc.com \
--to=fedor@doc.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=msnyder@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox