Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Ludvig <mludvig@suse.cz>
To: Pierre Muller <muller@cerbere.u-strasbg.fr>
Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA] New bitflags type and eflags on i386/x86-64
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 10:11:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3CCD7EA6.4020807@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4.2.0.58.20020429180717.020bacb0@ics.u-strasbg.fr>

Pierre Muller wrote:
> Given this info, I would support the creation of a TYPE_CODE_FLAGS 
> rather than trying to use pascal sets.
> Note that the code submitted does failm to write the flags if language is set to 
> pascal for instance... So this means that the p-valprint and
> maybe others (f-valprint or jv-valprint code should be adapted too).
> So maybe the best would be to move thiscode from c-valprint.c to valprint.c
> and simply call it for the different language-valprint.c sources.

Thanks for comments. I'll rework the patch and send again for approval 
with these changes. I was never a fan of "raping" type SET for this 
purpose.

> Last but not least, adding this  patch for i386-tdep source would allow to use
> this code also for normal  i386 cpus.

Sure, this bit is easy.

Michal Ludvig
-- 
* SuSE CR, s.r.o     * mludvig@suse.cz
* +420 2 9654 5373   * http://www.suse.cz


  reply	other threads:[~2002-04-29 17:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-04-22  8:15 Michal Ludvig
2002-04-22  8:45 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-04-22  9:08   ` Michal Ludvig
2002-04-22 19:05     ` Andrew Cagney
2002-04-22 21:28     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-04-23  6:22       ` Michal Ludvig
2002-04-23  7:32         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-04-29  9:54   ` Pierre Muller
2002-04-29 10:11     ` Michal Ludvig [this message]
2002-04-29 10:17     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-04-22  8:35 Michal Ludvig
2002-08-27 14:50 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-08-28  7:48   ` Michal Ludvig
2002-08-28  8:08     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-08-28  8:09       ` Michal Ludvig
2002-08-28 10:03       ` Andrew Cagney
2002-08-29  7:20   ` Michal Ludvig
2002-08-29  7:57     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-08-29  8:03       ` Michal Ludvig
2002-08-29  8:15         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-08-29  8:59           ` Andrew Cagney
2002-08-29 16:37             ` Mark Kettenis
2002-08-30  7:09               ` Michal Ludvig
2002-08-30  7:05             ` Michal Ludvig
2002-08-30  7:12               ` Pierre Muller
2002-08-30  7:41                 ` Michal Ludvig
2002-08-30  8:14                   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-08-30 10:18                     ` Pierre Muller
2002-09-03  2:17                       ` Michal Ludvig
2002-09-03  5:30                         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-09-05  1:04                           ` Michal Ludvig
2002-09-06 13:01                             ` Mark Kettenis
2002-09-09 20:35                               ` Andrew Cagney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3CCD7EA6.4020807@suse.cz \
    --to=mludvig@suse.cz \
    --cc=drow@mvista.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=muller@cerbere.u-strasbg.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox