From: Mark Kettenis <kettenis@chello.nl>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@ges.redhat.com>
Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>,
Michal Ludvig <mludvig@suse.cz>,
Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>,
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA] New bitflags type and eflags on i386/x86-64
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 16:37:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <868z2pp8vt.fsf@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Andrew Cagney's message of "Thu, 29 Aug 2002 11:42:38 -0400"
Andrew Cagney <ac131313@ges.redhat.com> writes:
> MarkK, I believe, is planning on merging much of the i386 and x86-64
> stuff so that a single GDB would support both -- that would remove the
> issue.
Isn't going to happen before branching. My problem is that I don't
have the opportunity to test an x86-64 target. I might have a go at
integrating bits, but Michal will probably have to test those changes
for me.
> Is there any immediate technical problem stopping x86-64 linking in
> i386-tdep.c? (Yes scary, multi-arch).
Well, the very least that should be done is merging
x86_64_gdbarch_init with i386_gdbarch_init.
Mark
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-08-29 23:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-04-22 8:35 Michal Ludvig
2002-08-27 14:50 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-08-28 7:48 ` Michal Ludvig
2002-08-28 8:08 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-08-28 8:09 ` Michal Ludvig
2002-08-28 10:03 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-08-29 7:20 ` Michal Ludvig
2002-08-29 7:57 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-08-29 8:03 ` Michal Ludvig
2002-08-29 8:15 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-08-29 8:59 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-08-29 16:37 ` Mark Kettenis [this message]
2002-08-30 7:09 ` Michal Ludvig
2002-08-30 7:05 ` Michal Ludvig
2002-08-30 7:12 ` Pierre Muller
2002-08-30 7:41 ` Michal Ludvig
2002-08-30 8:14 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-08-30 10:18 ` Pierre Muller
2002-09-03 2:17 ` Michal Ludvig
2002-09-03 5:30 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-09-05 1:04 ` Michal Ludvig
2002-09-06 13:01 ` Mark Kettenis
2002-09-09 20:35 ` Andrew Cagney
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-04-22 8:15 Michal Ludvig
2002-04-22 8:45 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-04-22 9:08 ` Michal Ludvig
2002-04-22 19:05 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-04-22 21:28 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-04-23 6:22 ` Michal Ludvig
2002-04-23 7:32 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-04-29 9:54 ` Pierre Muller
2002-04-29 10:11 ` Michal Ludvig
2002-04-29 10:17 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=868z2pp8vt.fsf@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org \
--to=kettenis@chello.nl \
--cc=ac131313@ges.redhat.com \
--cc=ac131313@redhat.com \
--cc=drow@mvista.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=mludvig@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox