From: Michal Ludvig <mludvig@suse.cz>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
Cc: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@ges.redhat.com>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA] New bitflags type and eflags on i386/x86-64
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 08:09:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D6CE756.7010800@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020828144901.GA21703@nevyn.them.org>
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> But Andrew's patch doesn't require a new infrastructure, which is nice.
> I stand by all my previous objections to your patch. We have a type
> that does this
No, it does something else and perhaps it could be tweaked to do what I
need.
> fix its complex, nested interface, then!
I believe FLAGS would be in use more often then SET. Why to "rape" SET
everytime when I'd need it to behave like FLAGS? It's much clearer to
have FLAGS type for flags puropses.
Michal Ludvig
--
* SuSE CR, s.r.o * mludvig@suse.cz
* +420 2 9654 5373 * http://www.suse.cz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-08-28 15:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-04-22 8:35 Michal Ludvig
2002-08-27 14:50 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-08-28 7:48 ` Michal Ludvig
2002-08-28 8:08 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-08-28 8:09 ` Michal Ludvig [this message]
2002-08-28 10:03 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-08-29 7:20 ` Michal Ludvig
2002-08-29 7:57 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-08-29 8:03 ` Michal Ludvig
2002-08-29 8:15 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-08-29 8:59 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-08-29 16:37 ` Mark Kettenis
2002-08-30 7:09 ` Michal Ludvig
2002-08-30 7:05 ` Michal Ludvig
2002-08-30 7:12 ` Pierre Muller
2002-08-30 7:41 ` Michal Ludvig
2002-08-30 8:14 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-08-30 10:18 ` Pierre Muller
2002-09-03 2:17 ` Michal Ludvig
2002-09-03 5:30 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-09-05 1:04 ` Michal Ludvig
2002-09-06 13:01 ` Mark Kettenis
2002-09-09 20:35 ` Andrew Cagney
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-04-22 8:15 Michal Ludvig
2002-04-22 8:45 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-04-22 9:08 ` Michal Ludvig
2002-04-22 19:05 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-04-22 21:28 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-04-23 6:22 ` Michal Ludvig
2002-04-23 7:32 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-04-29 9:54 ` Pierre Muller
2002-04-29 10:11 ` Michal Ludvig
2002-04-29 10:17 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3D6CE756.7010800@suse.cz \
--to=mludvig@suse.cz \
--cc=ac131313@ges.redhat.com \
--cc=drow@mvista.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox