* [rfa:sparc] Remove write_fp() from sparc-tdep.c
@ 2002-04-05 14:04 Andrew Cagney
2002-04-05 14:38 ` Michael Snyder
2002-04-05 16:03 ` Kevin Buettner
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2002-04-05 14:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 202 bytes --]
Hello,
The attached deletes the write_fp() function from the sparc-tdep.c code.
Ok?
Once this is in, I'll commit the other patch that simply deletes
write_fp() from the architecture vector.
Andrew
[-- Attachment #2: diffs --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2320 bytes --]
2002-04-04 Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
* sparc-tdep.c (sparc64_write_fp): Delete.
(sparc_push_dummy_frame): Replace write_fp call with code to store
the FP directly.
(sparc_gdbarch_init): Do not initialize write_fp.
Index: sparc-tdep.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/sparc-tdep.c,v
retrieving revision 1.23
diff -u -r1.23 sparc-tdep.c
--- sparc-tdep.c 2002/02/20 10:42:59 1.23
+++ sparc-tdep.c 2002/04/05 21:58:56
@@ -986,8 +986,18 @@
if (strcmp (target_shortname, "sim") != 0)
{
- write_fp (old_sp);
-
+ if (gdbarch_tdep (current_gdbarch)->intreg_size == 8)
+ {
+ CORE_ADDR oldfp = read_register (FP_REGNUM);
+ if (oldfp & 1)
+ write_register (FP_REGNUM, old_sp - 2047);
+ else
+ write_register (FP_REGNUM, old_sp);
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ write_register (FP_REGNUM, old_sp);
+ }
/* Set return address register for the call dummy to the current PC. */
write_register (I7_REGNUM, read_pc () - 8);
}
@@ -2261,16 +2271,6 @@
write_register (SP_REGNUM, val);
}
-void
-sparc64_write_fp (CORE_ADDR val)
-{
- CORE_ADDR oldfp = read_register (FP_REGNUM);
- if (oldfp & 1)
- write_register (FP_REGNUM, val - 2047);
- else
- write_register (FP_REGNUM, val);
-}
-
/* The SPARC 64 ABI passes floating-point arguments in FP0 to FP31,
and all other arguments in O0 to O5. They are also copied onto
the stack in the correct places. Apparently (empirically),
@@ -3038,7 +3038,6 @@
set_gdbarch_store_struct_return (gdbarch, sparc32_store_struct_return);
set_gdbarch_use_struct_convention (gdbarch,
generic_use_struct_convention);
- set_gdbarch_write_fp (gdbarch, generic_target_write_fp);
set_gdbarch_write_sp (gdbarch, generic_target_write_sp);
tdep->y_regnum = SPARC32_Y_REGNUM;
tdep->fp_max_regnum = SPARC_FP0_REGNUM + 32;
@@ -3097,7 +3096,6 @@
set_gdbarch_store_struct_return (gdbarch, sparc64_store_struct_return);
set_gdbarch_use_struct_convention (gdbarch,
sparc64_use_struct_convention);
- set_gdbarch_write_fp (gdbarch, sparc64_write_fp);
set_gdbarch_write_sp (gdbarch, sparc64_write_sp);
tdep->y_regnum = SPARC64_Y_REGNUM;
tdep->fp_max_regnum = SPARC_FP0_REGNUM + 48;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [rfa:sparc] Remove write_fp() from sparc-tdep.c
2002-04-05 14:04 [rfa:sparc] Remove write_fp() from sparc-tdep.c Andrew Cagney
@ 2002-04-05 14:38 ` Michael Snyder
2002-04-05 15:01 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-04-05 16:03 ` Kevin Buettner
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Michael Snyder @ 2002-04-05 14:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Cagney; +Cc: gdb-patches
Andrew Cagney wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> The attached deletes the write_fp() function from the sparc-tdep.c code.
>
> Ok?
>
> Once this is in, I'll commit the other patch that simply deletes
> write_fp() from the architecture vector.
Looks good.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 2002-04-04 Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
>
> * sparc-tdep.c (sparc64_write_fp): Delete.
> (sparc_push_dummy_frame): Replace write_fp call with code to store
> the FP directly.
> (sparc_gdbarch_init): Do not initialize write_fp.
>
> Index: sparc-tdep.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/sparc-tdep.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.23
> diff -u -r1.23 sparc-tdep.c
> --- sparc-tdep.c 2002/02/20 10:42:59 1.23
> +++ sparc-tdep.c 2002/04/05 21:58:56
> @@ -986,8 +986,18 @@
>
> if (strcmp (target_shortname, "sim") != 0)
> {
> - write_fp (old_sp);
> -
> + if (gdbarch_tdep (current_gdbarch)->intreg_size == 8)
> + {
> + CORE_ADDR oldfp = read_register (FP_REGNUM);
> + if (oldfp & 1)
> + write_register (FP_REGNUM, old_sp - 2047);
> + else
> + write_register (FP_REGNUM, old_sp);
> + }
> + else
> + {
> + write_register (FP_REGNUM, old_sp);
> + }
> /* Set return address register for the call dummy to the current PC. */
> write_register (I7_REGNUM, read_pc () - 8);
> }
> @@ -2261,16 +2271,6 @@
> write_register (SP_REGNUM, val);
> }
>
> -void
> -sparc64_write_fp (CORE_ADDR val)
> -{
> - CORE_ADDR oldfp = read_register (FP_REGNUM);
> - if (oldfp & 1)
> - write_register (FP_REGNUM, val - 2047);
> - else
> - write_register (FP_REGNUM, val);
> -}
> -
> /* The SPARC 64 ABI passes floating-point arguments in FP0 to FP31,
> and all other arguments in O0 to O5. They are also copied onto
> the stack in the correct places. Apparently (empirically),
> @@ -3038,7 +3038,6 @@
> set_gdbarch_store_struct_return (gdbarch, sparc32_store_struct_return);
> set_gdbarch_use_struct_convention (gdbarch,
> generic_use_struct_convention);
> - set_gdbarch_write_fp (gdbarch, generic_target_write_fp);
> set_gdbarch_write_sp (gdbarch, generic_target_write_sp);
> tdep->y_regnum = SPARC32_Y_REGNUM;
> tdep->fp_max_regnum = SPARC_FP0_REGNUM + 32;
> @@ -3097,7 +3096,6 @@
> set_gdbarch_store_struct_return (gdbarch, sparc64_store_struct_return);
> set_gdbarch_use_struct_convention (gdbarch,
> sparc64_use_struct_convention);
> - set_gdbarch_write_fp (gdbarch, sparc64_write_fp);
> set_gdbarch_write_sp (gdbarch, sparc64_write_sp);
> tdep->y_regnum = SPARC64_Y_REGNUM;
> tdep->fp_max_regnum = SPARC_FP0_REGNUM + 48;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [rfa:sparc] Remove write_fp() from sparc-tdep.c
2002-04-05 14:38 ` Michael Snyder
@ 2002-04-05 15:01 ` Andrew Cagney
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2002-04-05 15:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Snyder; +Cc: gdb-patches
> Andrew Cagney wrote:
>
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> The attached deletes the write_fp() function from the sparc-tdep.c code.
>>
>> Ok?
>>
>> Once this is in, I'll commit the other patch that simply deletes
>> write_fp() from the architecture vector.
>
>
> Looks good.
>
Thanks! I'll add a comment explaing the history of that bit of code as
well before committing.
Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [rfa:sparc] Remove write_fp() from sparc-tdep.c
2002-04-05 14:04 [rfa:sparc] Remove write_fp() from sparc-tdep.c Andrew Cagney
2002-04-05 14:38 ` Michael Snyder
@ 2002-04-05 16:03 ` Kevin Buettner
2002-04-05 16:05 ` Andrew Cagney
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Kevin Buettner @ 2002-04-05 16:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Cagney, gdb-patches
On Apr 5, 5:04pm, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> if (strcmp (target_shortname, "sim") != 0)
> {
> - write_fp (old_sp);
> -
> + if (gdbarch_tdep (current_gdbarch)->intreg_size == 8)
How about
if (GDB_TARGET_IS_SPARC64)
instead? (That matches the existing convention in the rest of the
file better.)
Aside from that, I think your change is fine. Something to consider
though is whether the entire
if (strcmp (target_shortname, "sim") != 0)
{
...
}
could simply go away. I.e, let the "sim" case just use the non-sim
code.
Kevin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [rfa:sparc] Remove write_fp() from sparc-tdep.c
2002-04-05 16:03 ` Kevin Buettner
@ 2002-04-05 16:05 ` Andrew Cagney
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2002-04-05 16:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kevin Buettner; +Cc: gdb-patches
> On Apr 5, 5:04pm, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>
>
>> if (strcmp (target_shortname, "sim") != 0)
>> {
>> - write_fp (old_sp);
>> -
>> + if (gdbarch_tdep (current_gdbarch)->intreg_size == 8)
>
>
> How about
>
> if (GDB_TARGET_IS_SPARC64)
Didn't see it, I'll tweak it.
> instead? (That matches the existing convention in the rest of the
> file better.)
>
> Aside from that, I think your change is fine. Something to consider
> though is whether the entire
>
> if (strcmp (target_shortname, "sim") != 0)
> {
> ...
> }
>
> could simply go away. I.e, let the "sim" case just use the non-sim
> code.
Somebody elses problem - the only objective of this patch was to remove
write_fp() :-)
thanks,
Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-04-06 0:05 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-04-05 14:04 [rfa:sparc] Remove write_fp() from sparc-tdep.c Andrew Cagney
2002-04-05 14:38 ` Michael Snyder
2002-04-05 15:01 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-04-05 16:03 ` Kevin Buettner
2002-04-05 16:05 ` Andrew Cagney
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox