Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
To: Pedro Alves <pedro@palves.net>
Cc: gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Update gnulib to current trunk
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2020 14:41:10 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200823214110.GG24789@adacore.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200823213725.GA12645@adacore.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2102 bytes --]

> Christian seems to be busy these days, so I thought I could try to
> help get this one in.
> 
> I'm going to quote the whole discussion below hoping this helps make it
> easier for you to remember the details of this thread. which is about
> updating gnulib to a newer version in order to bring in a change that
> Eli wants for support of mingw.org's version of MinGW. If we wanted
> a quick summary, my understanding is that following: After a closer
> inspection of the delta in terms of modules this update causes,
> we found that:
> 
>   - btowc gets added, for which you say that we should keep an eye
>     on it wrt the logic in gdb/gdb_wchar.h, but I understand
>     we should be OK for now;
> 
>   - We lose gettimeofday, and decided to add it.
> 
>   - We lose sys_time, and you suggested that the easiest is probably
>     to accept that for now.
> 
> I have taken Christian's patch, and rebased it (there was one conflict
> in gnulib/configure, which I resolved by regenerating it), and then
> modified it to add gettimeofday.
> 
> As it happens, when doing that, we get sys_time back, as well as
> localtime-buffer too. So, even though we said we could wait and
> do nothing about it, the question becomes moot.
> 
> Attached is the diff between Christian's patch (once rebased).
> I am attaching those even though this is not the patch I am proposing
> because it should allow everyone to see the actual effect of adding
> gettimeofday back, and see that the new version does bring what we want
> and only what we want. It's only a few files, but still rather large
> because of the files being added (back). So I made two versions:
> One with the new files being elided, and the second containing the full
> diff, but gziped.  Hopefully that'll fit within the mailinglist's
> maximum email size.
> 
> I will send the actuall full patch, which consists of Christian
> and my changes combined, with the ChangeLog updated accordingly,
> in a separate email, also in an effort to stay under the maximum
> email size limit.

And attached is the full patch proposed for the push.

-- 
Joel

[-- Attachment #2: 0001-Update-gnulib-to-current-trunk.patch.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 88724 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2020-08-23 21:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20200630184349.4009048-1-cbiesinger@google.com>
2020-06-30 19:19 ` Christian Biesinger
2020-07-02 18:49   ` Pedro Alves
2020-07-02 19:02     ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-07-02 19:06       ` Pedro Alves
2020-07-06 18:19         ` Christian Biesinger
2020-07-15  2:40           ` Christian Biesinger
2020-07-16 14:56           ` Pedro Alves
2020-08-13 12:24             ` Tom de Vries
2020-08-23 21:37             ` Joel Brobecker
2020-08-23 21:41               ` Joel Brobecker [this message]
2020-08-24 13:46               ` Pedro Alves
2020-08-26 22:39                 ` Joel Brobecker
2020-08-27 19:41                   ` Christian Biesinger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200823214110.GG24789@adacore.com \
    --to=brobecker@adacore.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=pedro@palves.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox