From: "Ulrich Weigand" <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
To: qiyaoltc@gmail.com (Yao Qi)
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Adjust Value.location for lval_register
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2016 12:10:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161125121002.2CF3910BCB8@oc8523832656.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161125115744.GA22209@E107787-LIN> from "Yao Qi" at Nov 25, 2016 11:57:44 AM
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 12:51:30PM +0100, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> >
> >
> > > /* Describes offset of a value within lval of a structure in target
> > > addressable memory units. If lval == lval_memory, this is an offset to
> > > - the address. If lval == lval_register, this is a further offset from
> > > - location.address within the registers structure. Note also the member
> > > - embedded_offset below. */
> > > + the address. Note also the member embedded_offset below. */
> > > LONGEST offset;
> >
> > Hmm, I think we recently had the discussion that *any* values should allow
> > using an offset. The comment should probably reflect this.
> >
>
> How about "Describes offset of a value within lval of a structure. Note
> also the member embedded_offset below."?
I think we should leave in the "in target addressable memory units" to clarify
that this is a *byte* offset, not a bit offset.
Otherwise, looks good to me.
Bye,
Ulrich
--
Dr. Ulrich Weigand
GNU/Linux compilers and toolchain
Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-25 12:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-22 15:49 [PATCH 0/3] New function value_has_address Yao Qi
2016-11-22 15:49 ` [PATCH 3/3] Restrict value_has_address Yao Qi
2016-11-22 18:06 ` Pedro Alves
2016-11-22 15:49 ` [PATCH 1/3] New function value_has_address Yao Qi
2016-11-22 16:50 ` Joel Brobecker
2016-11-22 17:56 ` Pedro Alves
2016-11-22 18:16 ` Ulrich Weigand
2016-11-22 18:29 ` Pedro Alves
2016-11-23 9:26 ` Yao Qi
2016-11-23 12:50 ` Ulrich Weigand
2016-11-25 10:07 ` [PATCH 0/3] regnum and next_frame_id are only used for lval_register Yao Qi
2016-11-25 10:07 ` [PATCH 3/3] Restrict checking value.lval on using address Yao Qi
2016-11-25 11:52 ` Ulrich Weigand
2016-11-28 17:22 ` Yao Qi
2016-11-25 10:07 ` [PATCH 2/3] Adjust Value.location for lval_register Yao Qi
2016-11-25 11:51 ` Ulrich Weigand
2016-11-25 11:57 ` Yao Qi
2016-11-25 12:10 ` Ulrich Weigand [this message]
2016-11-28 17:22 ` Yao Qi
2016-11-25 10:07 ` [PATCH 1/3] Move computed value's frame id to piece_closure Yao Qi
2016-11-25 11:48 ` Ulrich Weigand
2016-11-28 17:20 ` Yao Qi
2016-11-22 15:49 ` [PATCH 2/3] Set VALUE_VAL before set_value_address Yao Qi
2016-11-22 17:46 ` Luis Machado
2016-11-22 18:03 ` Pedro Alves
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161125121002.2CF3910BCB8@oc8523832656.ibm.com \
--to=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=qiyaoltc@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox