From: "Ulrich Weigand" <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
To: palves@redhat.com (Pedro Alves)
Cc: brobecker@adacore.com (Joel Brobecker),
qiyaoltc@gmail.com (Yao Qi),
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] New function value_has_address
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 18:16:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161122181616.118F810B923@oc8523832656.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bedd2d39-f72b-f4a5-82f1-d50099cbb5d7@redhat.com> from "Pedro Alves" at Nov 22, 2016 05:56:07 PM
Pedro Alves wrote:
> On 11/22/2016 04:50 PM, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> > Hey Yao,
> >
> >> +/* Return true if VALUE has address, otherwise return false. */
> >> +
> >> +static int
> >> +value_has_address (const struct value *value)
> >> +{
> >> + return (value->lval != lval_internalvar
> >> + && value->lval != lval_internalvar_component
> >> + && value->lval != lval_xcallable);
> >
> > I'm wondering about the function's name. Does a value that
> > lives in a register, for instance, really have an address?
> > For me, if there was a function value_has_address, it would
> > return nonzero only for lval_memory. I'm not too sure if
> > lval_computed would qualify or not.
> >
> > Perhaps, what you were looking for, is something like
> > value_lives_in_inferior?
>
> The intention of the function is to return true if the value
> uses the value.location.address union field as location:
>
> /* Location of value (if lval). */
> union
> {
> /* If lval == lval_memory, this is the address in the inferior.
> If lval == lval_register, this is the byte offset into the
> registers structure. */
> CORE_ADDR address;
> ...
> } location;
>
> I think that it's good that the names match. If one is renamed,
> so should the other, IMO. Maybe call the function
> value_has_address_location? I think it'd be good if the
> function's intro comment made this link more explicit.
> Actually, I see now that patch #3 tweaks the comment.
I think part of the confusion is that the comment above is simply
no longer true; for lval_register values, address is *not* (any longer)
used to hold any byte offset into a register structure, as far as I
can see. Instead, for lval_register values, the register that holds
the value is identifed solely via the VALUE_REGNUM/VALUE_NEXT_FRAME_ID
fields, and the address field is ignored.
I think we should reword the comments to reflect the fact that
"address" is only used for lval_address. On the other hand,
the regnum/frame_id fields should move into the union and only
be used for lval_register values ...
Bye,
Ulrich
--
Dr. Ulrich Weigand
GNU/Linux compilers and toolchain
Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-22 18:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-22 15:49 [PATCH 0/3] " Yao Qi
2016-11-22 15:49 ` [PATCH 3/3] Restrict value_has_address Yao Qi
2016-11-22 18:06 ` Pedro Alves
2016-11-22 15:49 ` [PATCH 1/3] New function value_has_address Yao Qi
2016-11-22 16:50 ` Joel Brobecker
2016-11-22 17:56 ` Pedro Alves
2016-11-22 18:16 ` Ulrich Weigand [this message]
2016-11-22 18:29 ` Pedro Alves
2016-11-23 9:26 ` Yao Qi
2016-11-23 12:50 ` Ulrich Weigand
2016-11-25 10:07 ` [PATCH 0/3] regnum and next_frame_id are only used for lval_register Yao Qi
2016-11-25 10:07 ` [PATCH 3/3] Restrict checking value.lval on using address Yao Qi
2016-11-25 11:52 ` Ulrich Weigand
2016-11-28 17:22 ` Yao Qi
2016-11-25 10:07 ` [PATCH 1/3] Move computed value's frame id to piece_closure Yao Qi
2016-11-25 11:48 ` Ulrich Weigand
2016-11-28 17:20 ` Yao Qi
2016-11-25 10:07 ` [PATCH 2/3] Adjust Value.location for lval_register Yao Qi
2016-11-25 11:51 ` Ulrich Weigand
2016-11-25 11:57 ` Yao Qi
2016-11-25 12:10 ` Ulrich Weigand
2016-11-28 17:22 ` Yao Qi
2016-11-22 15:49 ` [PATCH 2/3] Set VALUE_VAL before set_value_address Yao Qi
2016-11-22 17:46 ` Luis Machado
2016-11-22 18:03 ` Pedro Alves
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161122181616.118F810B923@oc8523832656.ibm.com \
--to=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
--cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=qiyaoltc@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox