From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@codesourcery.com>
Cc: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: one-too-many location in breakpoint
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2011 08:47:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111209081919.GK21915@adacore.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.10.1112081556410.5354@tp.orcam.me.uk>
> I can see you made this adjustment:
>
> - gdb_test "break ${class}::foo if (a == 3)" "Breakpoint (\[0-9\]).*"
> + gdb_test "break ${class}::hibob if (a_param == 3)" "Breakpoint
>
> but there's this definition elsewhere in this test case:
>
> set conditional1 "if (a == 3)"
>
> as well, that you have left intact. Should it be adjusted accordingly?
I think it did get adjusted yesterday.
> Why is this condition accepted for some targets and not for some
> others anyway?
Tom said:
> I missed a spot when changing the parameter names in ovsrch.exp, and
> didn't notice because I have the 64-bit glibc debuginfo installed, which
> provides a minsym named "a".
I've hit this sort of problem several times in the past, and that's why
I choose funky and unambiguous names for my global variables....
--
Joel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-09 8:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-23 16:39 GDB 7.4 branching status? (2011-11-23) Joel Brobecker
2011-11-23 16:56 ` Tristan Gingold
2011-11-23 18:47 ` Tom Tromey
2011-11-23 23:24 ` Joel Brobecker
2011-11-24 10:56 ` Jerome Guitton
2011-11-24 16:33 ` Joel Brobecker
2011-11-28 16:17 ` Tom Tromey
2011-11-28 21:29 ` Tom Tromey
2011-11-29 2:28 ` Joel Brobecker
2011-11-29 2:49 ` iterate_over_symbols should be a wrapper? (was: "Re: GDB 7.4 branching status? (2011-11-23)") Joel Brobecker
2011-11-29 15:27 ` iterate_over_symbols should be a wrapper? Tom Tromey
2011-11-29 3:07 ` partial-symtab symbol sorting (was: "Re: GDB 7.4 branching status? (2011-11-23)") Joel Brobecker
2011-11-29 8:41 ` Pierre Muller
2011-11-29 14:51 ` partial-symtab symbol sorting Tom Tromey
[not found] ` <47228.5772244961$1322556128@news.gmane.org>
2011-11-29 14:55 ` Tom Tromey
2011-11-29 3:11 ` multiple-location breakpoint output (was: "Re: GDB 7.4 branching status? (2011-11-23)") Joel Brobecker
2011-11-29 15:06 ` multiple-location breakpoint output Tom Tromey
2011-11-29 3:14 ` decode_digits_line_mode (was: "Re: GDB 7.4 branching status? (2011-11-23)") Joel Brobecker
2011-11-29 14:56 ` decode_digits_line_mode Tom Tromey
2011-11-29 3:19 ` [RFA/commit/testcase] "info line" should not skip prologues (was: "Re: GDB 7.4 branching status? (2011-11-23)") Joel Brobecker
2011-11-29 15:03 ` [RFA/commit/testcase] "info line" should not skip prologues Tom Tromey
2011-11-29 17:00 ` Joel Brobecker
2011-11-29 3:22 ` GDB 7.4 branching status? (2011-11-23) Joel Brobecker
2011-11-29 15:38 ` Tom Tromey
2011-11-29 3:29 ` set multiple-symbol ask/cancel not working (was: "Re: GDB 7.4 branching status? (2011-11-23)") Joel Brobecker
2011-11-29 16:14 ` set multiple-symbol ask/cancel not working Tom Tromey
2011-11-29 16:57 ` Tom Tromey
2011-11-29 17:06 ` Joel Brobecker
2011-11-30 16:41 ` Tom Tromey
2011-11-29 3:33 ` one-too-many location in breakpoint (was: "Re: GDB 7.4 branching status? (2011-11-23)") Joel Brobecker
2011-11-29 16:15 ` one-too-many location in breakpoint Tom Tromey
2011-11-29 16:59 ` Tom Tromey
2011-11-30 5:59 ` Joel Brobecker
2011-11-30 16:41 ` Tom Tromey
2011-12-05 12:04 ` Pedro Alves
2011-12-05 12:17 ` Pedro Alves
2011-12-08 18:56 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2011-12-09 8:47 ` Joel Brobecker [this message]
2011-11-24 0:58 ` GDB 7.4 branching status? (2011-11-23) Yao Qi
2011-11-24 17:17 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2011-11-24 17:27 ` Joel Brobecker
2011-12-03 1:19 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111209081919.GK21915@adacore.com \
--to=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=macro@codesourcery.com \
--cc=tromey@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox