From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
To: Jerome Guitton <guitton@adacore.com>
Cc: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: GDB 7.4 branching status? (2011-11-23)
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 16:33:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111124163304.GR13809@adacore.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111124105603.GA91879@adacore.com>
> Well, having a regression for Ada defeats the second principle, IMHO :)
Yes, but right now, we cannot seem to satisfy all of our principles,
so it is a matter of deciding what's best for this iteration.
> What about having the same heuristics as expand_line_sal used to have
> for this kind of issue? At least we would have the exact same behavior
> as before...
We proposed that as well, and I am fine with that approach too. But
we have to bear in mind that we will be missing some location in
some (corner only?) cases.
So, for now, either approach is fine with me, maybe with a slight
preference for possibly accepting more locations in order to avoid
missing some. So prefer keeping the previous the previous heuristic,
which I think makes sense as well - no surprise in a way. What do
others think?
--
Joel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-24 16:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-23 16:39 Joel Brobecker
2011-11-23 16:56 ` Tristan Gingold
2011-11-23 18:47 ` Tom Tromey
2011-11-23 23:24 ` Joel Brobecker
2011-11-24 10:56 ` Jerome Guitton
2011-11-24 16:33 ` Joel Brobecker [this message]
2011-11-28 16:17 ` Tom Tromey
2011-11-28 21:29 ` Tom Tromey
2011-11-29 2:28 ` Joel Brobecker
2011-11-29 2:49 ` iterate_over_symbols should be a wrapper? (was: "Re: GDB 7.4 branching status? (2011-11-23)") Joel Brobecker
2011-11-29 15:27 ` iterate_over_symbols should be a wrapper? Tom Tromey
2011-11-29 3:07 ` partial-symtab symbol sorting (was: "Re: GDB 7.4 branching status? (2011-11-23)") Joel Brobecker
2011-11-29 8:41 ` Pierre Muller
2011-11-29 14:51 ` partial-symtab symbol sorting Tom Tromey
[not found] ` <47228.5772244961$1322556128@news.gmane.org>
2011-11-29 14:55 ` Tom Tromey
2011-11-29 3:11 ` multiple-location breakpoint output (was: "Re: GDB 7.4 branching status? (2011-11-23)") Joel Brobecker
2011-11-29 15:06 ` multiple-location breakpoint output Tom Tromey
2011-11-29 3:14 ` decode_digits_line_mode (was: "Re: GDB 7.4 branching status? (2011-11-23)") Joel Brobecker
2011-11-29 14:56 ` decode_digits_line_mode Tom Tromey
2011-11-29 3:19 ` [RFA/commit/testcase] "info line" should not skip prologues (was: "Re: GDB 7.4 branching status? (2011-11-23)") Joel Brobecker
2011-11-29 15:03 ` [RFA/commit/testcase] "info line" should not skip prologues Tom Tromey
2011-11-29 17:00 ` Joel Brobecker
2011-11-29 3:22 ` GDB 7.4 branching status? (2011-11-23) Joel Brobecker
2011-11-29 15:38 ` Tom Tromey
2011-11-29 3:29 ` set multiple-symbol ask/cancel not working (was: "Re: GDB 7.4 branching status? (2011-11-23)") Joel Brobecker
2011-11-29 16:14 ` set multiple-symbol ask/cancel not working Tom Tromey
2011-11-29 16:57 ` Tom Tromey
2011-11-29 17:06 ` Joel Brobecker
2011-11-30 16:41 ` Tom Tromey
2011-11-29 3:33 ` one-too-many location in breakpoint (was: "Re: GDB 7.4 branching status? (2011-11-23)") Joel Brobecker
2011-11-29 16:15 ` one-too-many location in breakpoint Tom Tromey
2011-11-29 16:59 ` Tom Tromey
2011-11-30 5:59 ` Joel Brobecker
2011-11-30 16:41 ` Tom Tromey
2011-12-05 12:04 ` Pedro Alves
2011-12-05 12:17 ` Pedro Alves
2011-12-08 18:56 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2011-12-09 8:47 ` Joel Brobecker
2011-11-24 0:58 ` GDB 7.4 branching status? (2011-11-23) Yao Qi
2011-11-24 17:17 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2011-11-24 17:27 ` Joel Brobecker
2011-12-03 1:19 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111124163304.GR13809@adacore.com \
--to=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=guitton@adacore.com \
--cc=tromey@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox