Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
To: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: GDB 7.4 branching status? (2011-11-23)
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 03:22:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111129032202.GQ24943@adacore.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m31ussq6o2.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 437 bytes --]

This patch is optional, and related to the problem that got fixed
by your latest patch series, mentioned in my previous email:
http://www.sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2011-11/msg00799.html

I still noticed a call to skip_prologue_sal without a check of
self->funfirstline.

Perhaps there is no situation where this might make a difference,
but I thought it might be good to add the check anyways, just
to be on the safe side.

-- 
Joel

[-- Attachment #2: 0004-call-skip_prologue_sal-only-if-self-funfirstline.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 1024 bytes --]

From abc12be76deaa5632094c1507f4dff284bd36c2b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 16:08:40 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 4/5] call skip_prologue_sal only if self->funfirstline

gdb/ChangeLog:

        * linespec.c (decode_all_digits): Call skip_prologue_sal
        only if self->funfirstline.
---
 gdb/linespec.c |    3 ++-
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gdb/linespec.c b/gdb/linespec.c
index 06b1dd2..146163a 100644
--- a/gdb/linespec.c
+++ b/gdb/linespec.c
@@ -2433,7 +2433,8 @@ decode_all_digits (struct linespec_state *self,
 
 	    /* Make sure the line matches the request, not what was
 	       found.  */
-	    skip_prologue_sal (&intermediate_results.sals[i]);
+	    if (self->funfirstline)
+	      skip_prologue_sal (&intermediate_results.sals[i]);
 	    intermediate_results.sals[i].line = val.line;
 	    add_sal_to_sals (self, &values, &intermediate_results.sals[i],
 			     sym ? SYMBOL_NATURAL_NAME (sym) : NULL);
-- 
1.7.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-11-29  3:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-11-23 16:39 Joel Brobecker
2011-11-23 16:56 ` Tristan Gingold
2011-11-23 18:47 ` Tom Tromey
2011-11-23 23:24   ` Joel Brobecker
2011-11-24 10:56     ` Jerome Guitton
2011-11-24 16:33       ` Joel Brobecker
2011-11-28 16:17         ` Tom Tromey
2011-11-28 21:29         ` Tom Tromey
2011-11-29  2:28           ` Joel Brobecker
2011-11-29  2:49           ` iterate_over_symbols should be a wrapper? (was: "Re: GDB 7.4 branching status? (2011-11-23)") Joel Brobecker
2011-11-29 15:27             ` iterate_over_symbols should be a wrapper? Tom Tromey
2011-11-29  3:07           ` partial-symtab symbol sorting (was: "Re: GDB 7.4 branching status? (2011-11-23)") Joel Brobecker
2011-11-29  8:41             ` Pierre Muller
2011-11-29 14:51             ` partial-symtab symbol sorting Tom Tromey
     [not found]             ` <47228.5772244961$1322556128@news.gmane.org>
2011-11-29 14:55               ` Tom Tromey
2011-11-29  3:11           ` multiple-location breakpoint output (was: "Re: GDB 7.4 branching status? (2011-11-23)") Joel Brobecker
2011-11-29 15:06             ` multiple-location breakpoint output Tom Tromey
2011-11-29  3:14           ` decode_digits_line_mode (was: "Re: GDB 7.4 branching status? (2011-11-23)") Joel Brobecker
2011-11-29 14:56             ` decode_digits_line_mode Tom Tromey
2011-11-29  3:19           ` [RFA/commit/testcase] "info line" should not skip prologues (was: "Re: GDB 7.4 branching status? (2011-11-23)") Joel Brobecker
2011-11-29 15:03             ` [RFA/commit/testcase] "info line" should not skip prologues Tom Tromey
2011-11-29 17:00               ` Joel Brobecker
2011-11-29  3:22           ` Joel Brobecker [this message]
2011-11-29 15:38             ` GDB 7.4 branching status? (2011-11-23) Tom Tromey
2011-11-29  3:29           ` set multiple-symbol ask/cancel not working (was: "Re: GDB 7.4 branching status? (2011-11-23)") Joel Brobecker
2011-11-29 16:14             ` set multiple-symbol ask/cancel not working Tom Tromey
2011-11-29 16:57               ` Tom Tromey
2011-11-29 17:06                 ` Joel Brobecker
2011-11-30 16:41                   ` Tom Tromey
2011-11-29  3:33           ` one-too-many location in breakpoint (was: "Re: GDB 7.4 branching status? (2011-11-23)") Joel Brobecker
2011-11-29 16:15             ` one-too-many location in breakpoint Tom Tromey
2011-11-29 16:59               ` Tom Tromey
2011-11-30  5:59                 ` Joel Brobecker
2011-11-30 16:41                   ` Tom Tromey
2011-12-05 12:04                 ` Pedro Alves
2011-12-05 12:17                   ` Pedro Alves
2011-12-08 18:56                 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2011-12-09  8:47                   ` Joel Brobecker
2011-11-24  0:58 ` GDB 7.4 branching status? (2011-11-23) Yao Qi
2011-11-24 17:17 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2011-11-24 17:27   ` Joel Brobecker
2011-12-03  1:19     ` Maciej W. Rozycki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20111129032202.GQ24943@adacore.com \
    --to=brobecker@adacore.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=tromey@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox